Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Research Australian industrial relations case law.

Full-text, concept and citation-graph search across 48,401 decisions, a 58,233-principle library, and a signal-weighted citation graph.
Natural language, citation ([2024] WAIRC 1), party name (Bradley v Binder), member (Cosentino), or concept:slug
48,401
Decisions
31,801
Analysed cases
58,233
Principles
178,106
Citation edges
Recent cases
[2026] FWC 2635
Yan Bai v Furnace Engineering Pty Ltd
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2634
[2026] FWC 2634
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2632
[2026] FWC 2632
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2629
[2026] FWC 2629
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2621
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Pacific National Services Pty Ltd
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2611
Ms Mc Keeley Fowler v Abbots and Kinney (Unley) Pty Ltd
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWCFB 169
[2026] FWCFB 169
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2633
Yau Yong Ryan Sim v Monash Health
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
[2026] FWC 2630
Jordan Keller v Podium Australia Pty Ltd
10 Jul 2026 · FWC
Browse by claim type
Unfair dismissal
22684 cases
s44 referrals & industrial disputes
5346 cases
Contractual benefit claims
7214 cases
Public sector matters
4250 cases
Workers compensation & WHS
1009 cases
Discrimination & victimisation
951 cases
Industrial instrument interpretation
7029 cases
Enterprise bargaining
10841 cases
Industrial action
4146 cases
Adverse / damaging action
3400 cases
Bullying & sexual harassment
1189 cases
Flexible working arrangements
959 cases
Wages, leave & other conditions
10247 cases
Employment status & sham contracting
3496 cases
Commission procedure & evidence
16882 cases
Example queries
Disclaimer: This database is provided for research and reference purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Decisions are sourced from publicly available records and reproduced for informational use. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy and completeness, users should verify decisions against official sources (WAIRC, FWC, AustLII) before relying on them. This tool does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner. Coverage of decisions may be incomplete, particularly for older or less commonly cited matters.