Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

George Gifford v Royale Hospitality Pty Ltd

[2025] WAIRC 00909 Single Commissioner (WAIRC) 2025-11-06 File: B 88/2021
Source
Commissioner Walkington
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: George Gifford
Respondent: Royale Hospitality Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Outcome

Against applicant dismissed_want_of_prosecution

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 5

[P]Procedural fairness at dismissal stage [P]Denied contractual benefits (WA s29(1)(b)) [P]Public sector discipline [S]Unfair dismissal (WA) [S]Unfair dismissal (federal)
Archived text (111 words)
CONTRACTUAL BENEFIT CLAIM WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION PARTIES George Gifford APPLICANT -v- Royale Hospitality Pty Ltd RESPONDENT CORAM Commissioner T B Walkington DATE Thursday, 6 November 2025 FILE NO/S B 88 OF 2021 CITATION NO. 2025 WAIRC 00909 Result Application dismissed for want of prosecution Representation Applicant No Appearance Respondent No Appearance Order HAVING convened a Show Cause Hearing on 2 September 2025 and there being no appearances on behalf of either party, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA), hereby orders – THAT the application be, and by this order, is dismissed for want of prosecution Commissioner T B Walkington