Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Application by Toogood & Qantas Airways Limited

[2016] FWC 1935 Fair Work Commission 2016-01-01 cited 1×
Source
Cited 1×
Applicant: Ms Alyce Toogood and Qantas Airways Limited

Ratio

The Fair Work Commission may make orders under s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to vary the coverage of enterprise agreements and awards in the context of a transfer of business, having regard to the views of the parties, potential disadvantage to employees, nominal expiry dates, economic impact on the new employer, business synergy, and the public interest. The Commission granted the order sought by Ms Toogood and Qantas, finding it appropriate in the circumstances where a transferable instrument would otherwise cover the transferring employee at the new employer.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Cited 1× Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 5

  • Ms Alyce Toogood was employed by Eastern Airlines Pty Ltd under the Eastern Australia Pty Limited and Australian Services Union Agreement 2012
  • Ms Toogood had been offered and accepted employment with Qantas Airways Limited
  • Ms Toogood's work with Qantas would be regulated by the Australian Services Union (Qantas Airways Limited) Enterprise Agreement 10
  • There was an association between Qantas and Eastern with a transfer of business anticipated to occur when Ms Toogood commenced employment with Qantas
  • The terms and conditions of employment with Qantas were considered more beneficial overall than those under the Eastern Agreement

Factors

For
  • The new employer (Qantas) and transferring employee (Ms Toogood) consented to the application
  • The proposed terms with Qantas were more beneficial overall to the employee
  • Application brought under the proper statutory mechanism (s.318)
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s318
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 2-8 Division 2
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s313(1)(a)

Concept tags · 5

[P]Enterprise agreement variation [P]Transmission of business (Pt 2-8) [S]Better off overall test (BOOT) [S]Jurisdictional facts [M]Employee v independent contractor

Principles · 2

articulates para 5
The FWC has power under s.318 to make orders that a transferable instrument would not, or will not, cover a new employer and transferring employee, or alternatively that an enterprise agreement or named employer award covering the new employer will cover a transferring employee.
articulates para 5
In deciding whether to make a s.318 order, the FWC must take into account: the views of the new employer and affected employees; whether employees would be disadvantaged; the nominal expiry date of any agreement; negative productivity impact; significant economic disadvantage to the new employer; degree of business synergy; and the public interest.
Test: s.318(3) mandatory considerations
Archived text (936 words)
Application by Toogood & Qantas Airways Limited [2016] FWC 1935 (1 April 2016) [2016] FWC 1935 FAIR WORK COMMISSION DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees Ms Alyce Toogood and Qantas Airways Limited (AG2016/512) Airline operations COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE SYDNEY, 1 APRIL 2016 Application for an Order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees. [1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Ms Alyce Toogood and Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas). Alyce Toogood is an employee of Eastern Airlines Pty Ltd (Eastern). [2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 9 March 2016. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Alyce Toogood who is an employee of Eastern and a prospective employee of Qantas. [3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that: Alyce Toogood is currently employed by Eastern under the terms of the Eastern Australia Pty Limited and Australian Services Union Agreement 2012 (the Eastern Agreement); Alyce Toogood has been offered and she has accepted employment with Qantas; The employment of a person performing the work that Alyce Toogood will perform with Qantas is regulated by the Australian Services Union (Qantas Airways Limited) Enterprise Agreement 10 (the Qantas Agreement); There is an association between Qantas and Eastern and a transfer of business from Eastern to Qantas in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2 - 8 of the Act, will occur when Alyce Toogood commences employment with Qantas as is anticipated; The terms and conditions of employment for Alyce Toogood with Qantas are considered to be, over time, more beneficial overall for Alyce Toogood than the terms applicable under the Eastern Agreement; and In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the Eastern Agreement would be likely to cover Alyce Toogood as a transferring employee and bind Qantas as a new employer. [4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 1 April 2016. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application. [5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms: “ 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees Orders that the FWC may make (1) The FWC may make the following orders: (a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee; (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee. Who may apply for an order (2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following: (a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; (b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee; (c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement; (d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b). Matters that the FWC must take into account (3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following: (a) the views of: (i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and (ii) the employees who would be affected by the order; (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment; (c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement; (d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace; (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer; (f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer; (g) the public interest. Restriction on when order may come into operation (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following: (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; (b) the day on which the order is made.” [6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought. [7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [ PR578453 ] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly. COMMISSIONER Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <Price code A, AE899555 PR578427 >