Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Application by Logan Ross

[2025] FWC 1726 Fair Work Commission 2025-06-19
Source
Not yet cited by other cases

Ratio

The application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order under s306E of the Fair Work Act was dismissed because the applicant failed to respond to the Commission's direction requiring demonstration that: (1) the City of Perth is a constitutional corporation or otherwise a regulated host under s306C; and (2) the City of Perth Salaried Workforce Agreement 2023 is a 'covered employment instrument' that applies to national system employees under s12. The Commission found the application had no reasonable prospects of success in the absence of submissions addressing these essential jurisdictional prerequisites.

Outcome

Against applicant dismissed

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 6

  • Logan Ross applied under s306E of the Fair Work Act for a regulated labour hire arrangement order
  • The applicant was employed by HOBAN Recruitment Pty Ltd to perform work for the City of Perth
  • The applicant identified the City of Perth Salaried Workforce Agreement 2023 as the host employment instrument
  • The Commission directed the applicant on 30 January 2025 to submit written submissions addressing jurisdictional matters by 27 February 2025
  • No response or submission was received from the applicant
  • The applicant did not otherwise contact the Commission

Factors

For
  • Application was properly made under s306E of the Fair Work Act with specified documents and notice
Against
  • City of Perth is not expressly identified as a constitutional corporation
  • City of Perth is not a Commonwealth entity, Commonwealth authority, territorial body, or entity in a referring State
  • The City of Perth Agreement is registered under WA Industrial Relations Act 1979 s41, not a covered employment instrument under FW Act s12(a)–(c)
  • No regulations prescribe WA-registered agreements as covered employment instruments under s12(e)
  • Applicant failed to respond to Commission direction despite clear warning that application may be dismissed
  • No demonstration that the host employer is a national system employer under s14 of the Fair Work Act

Concept tags · 4

[P]Regulated workers (gig / road transport) [P]Jurisdictional facts [P]Constitutional corporation test [S]Registered industrial agreement (WA)

Principles · 5

articulates para 2
A 'regulated host' for the purposes of s306E must satisfy one of the eight conditions in s306C, including being a constitutional corporation or an entity in a referring State
Test: Regulated host test under s306C FW Act
articulates para 2
A 'covered employment instrument' under s12 of the FW Act encompasses five categories: an enterprise agreement, workplace determination, Public Service Act determination, an instrument made under Commonwealth/State/Territory law providing terms and conditions for national system employees, or a prescribed instrument
Test: Covered employment instrument definition
articulates para 2
An agreement registered under s41 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) is not a 'covered employment instrument' under ss12(a)–(c) of the Fair Work Act and falls outside the scope of regulated labour hire jurisdiction unless it qualifies under s12(d)
Test: Coverage of WA instruments in federal labour hire regime
articulates para 4
An application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order may be dismissed under s587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act where the applicant fails to respond to a Commission direction and the application has no reasonable prospects of success
cites para 2
In order for the Commission to have power to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order under s306E of the FW Act, there must be a 'covered employment instrument' which 'applies' to the regulated host

Cases cited in this decision · 3

Cited
[2025] WAIRC 00012 — City of Perth v Western Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and...
"…e following correspondence be sent to Mr Ross from my chambers (omitting formal parts): In your application, it is stated that the employment instrument which applies to the host, City of Perth, is the City of Perth...…"
Cited
(2024) 333 IR 249 (not in corpus)
"…ined in (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) above. Therefore, you will need to demonstrate whether City of Perth is a constitutional corporation. Furthermore, as stated by a Full Bench of the Commission in...…"
Cited
[2024] FWCFB 299 — Callide Mine Union Enterprise Agreement 2021
"…), (e), (f), (g) and (h) above. Therefore, you will need to demonstrate whether City of Perth is a constitutional corporation. Furthermore, as stated by a Full Bench of the Commission in Application by the Mining and...…"
Archived text (974 words)
Application by Logan Ross [2025] FWC 1726 (19 June 2025) Last Updated: 20 June 2025 [2025] FWC 1726 FAIR WORK COMMISSION DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.306E —Application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order Application by Logan Ross (LH2025/4) JUSTICE HATCHER, PRESIDENT SYDNEY,19 JUNE 2025 Application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order in respect of HOBAN Recruitment Pty Ltd in relation to work performed for the City of Perth – failure to respond to Commission’s direction – application dismissed – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 587(1)(c). [1] On 21 January 2025, Logan Ross applied to the Commission under s 306E of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) for a regulated labour hire arrangement order in respect of his employment by HOBAN Recruitment Pty Ltd, (HOBAN) in relation to work performed for the City of Perth. In his application, Mr Ross names the ‘City of Perth Salaried Workforce Agreement 2023’ as the host employment instrument that would apply to him were he to be employed directly by the City of Perth. [2] On 30 January 2025, I directed that the following correspondence be sent to Mr Ross from my chambers (omitting formal parts): In your application, it is stated that the employment instrument which applies to the host, City of Perth, is the City of Perth Salaried Workforce Agreement 2023 [2025] WAIRC 00012 ( City of Perth Agreement ). Pursuant to s 306C of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ( FW Act ), a regulated host needs to be one of the following in order for the Commission to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order: (a) a constitutional corporation; or (b) the Commonwealth; or (c) a Commonwealth authority; or (d) a person, so far as work is performed for the person in connection with constitutional trade or commerce, and the work is of a kind that would ordinarily be performed by: (i) a flight crew officer; or (ii) a maritime employee; or (iii) a waterside worker; or (e) a body corporate incorporated in a Territory; or (f) a person who carries on an activity (whether of a commercial, governmental or other nature) in a Territory in Australia, so far as work is performed for the person in connection with the activity carried on in the Territory; or (g) a person, so far as work is performed for the person in a Territory in Australia; or (h) any person in a State that is a referring State because of Division 2A or 2B of Part 1-3. City of Perth is not an entity as defined in (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) above. Therefore, you will need to demonstrate whether City of Perth is a constitutional corporation. Furthermore, as stated by a Full Bench of the Commission in Application by the Mining and Energy Union (2024) 333 IR 249 ; [2024] FWCFB 299 in paragraph [12], in order for the Commission to have the power to make an order under s 306E of the FW Act, there must be a ‘covered employment instrument’ which ‘applies’ to the regulated host. Section 12 of the FW Act defines ‘covered employment instrument’ to encompass five categories of instrument, namely: (a) an enterprise agreement; or (b) a workplace determination; or (c) a determination under section 24 of the Public Service Act 1999 that applies to a class of APS employees in an Agency (within the meaning of that Act); or (d) an instrument made under any other law of the Commonwealth (other than this Act), or of a State or a Territory, that provides for the terms and conditions of employment for a class of national system employees of: (i) the Commonwealth or a State or Territory; or (ii) an authority of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory; or (e) any other instrument relating to the employment of a class of national system employees that: (i) is made under a law of the Commonwealth (other than this Act) or a State or Territory; and (ii) is prescribed by the regulations. The City of Perth Agreement is an agreement registered under s 41 of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA). It is therefore not a ‘covered employment instrument’ as defined in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) of the above definition. No regulations have been made to give operative effect to paragraph (e) of the definition. Therefore, in order for the application to have any prospects of success, the Commission will need to be satisfied that the City of Perth Agreement falls within paragraph (d) of the above definition. As an essential element of this, it will need to be demonstrated that the City of Perth Agreement provides for the terms and conditions of employment of national system employees as defined in s 13 of the FW Act. That will in turn require demonstration that the employer under the City of Perth Agreement is a national system employer as defined in s 14 of the FW Act. You are directed make a written submission addressing the issues identified above by way of email to [email protected] by 5:00 pm (AEDT) on Thursday, 27 February 2025 . You may wish to seek legal advice or obtain legal representation when preparing your submission. In the event that no submissions are made, the Commission may dismiss your application without further notice due to a lack of jurisdiction to consider your application. [3] To date, the Commission has not received a response to that correspondence. The applicant has not otherwise contacted the Commission. [4] In the absence of any further submissions as to the jurisdictional matters identified in the Commission’s correspondence, I find that the application has no reasonable prospects of success. Accordingly, the application is dismissed pursuant to s 587(1)(c) of the FW Act. PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR788370>