Amanda Jayne Varian v Front Line Financial Solutions Pty Ltd
Commissioner Kucera
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Amanda Jayne Varian
Respondent: Front Line Financial Solutions Pty Ltd
Ratio
The Commission made procedural orders by consent for the conduct of a contractual benefit claim under s 29(1)(d) of the IR Act, requiring exchange of documents, filing of witness statement evidence, and listing for further conciliation conference.
Outcome
Resolved
adjourned
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 4
- Applicant Amanda Jayne Varian brought application for contractual benefit claim
- Respondent is Front Line Financial Solutions Pty Ltd
- Conciliation conference held 27 March 2025 but matter not resolved
- Parties agreed to consent orders for further procedural directions
Legislation referenced
- Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) s 29(1)(d)
Concept tags · 7
Archived text (298 words)
CONTRACTUAL BENEFIT CLAIM
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES Amanda Jayne Varian
APPLICANT
-v-
Front Line Financial Solutions Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT
CORAM Commissioner T Kucera
DATE FRIday, 11 April 2025
FILE NO/S B 6 OF 2025
CITATION NO. 2025 WAIRC 00236
Result Order issued
Representation
Applicant Ms A Varian
Respondent Mr A King
Order
WHEREAS this is an application pursuant to s 29(1)(d) of the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) (The IR Act);
AND WHEREAS a conciliation conference was held on Thursday 27 March 2025, but the matter was not resolved;
HAVING HEARD from Ms A Varian on her own behalf and Mr A King on behalf of the respondent, the Commission, pursuant to its powers under the IR Act, hereby orders by consent —
THAT the parties are to provide informal discovery (exchange of documents relevant to the proceedings) by 17 April 2025.
THAT the evidence in chief in this matter is to be adduced by way of signed witness statements which will stand as the evidence in chief of their maker. Evidence in chief other than that contained in the witness statements may only be adduced by leave of the Commission.
THAT the applicant is to file her evidence in chief, in the form of witness statements in the manner required by practice note 9 of 2021 together with any documents upon which she intends to rely by 1 May 2025.
THAT the respondent is to file its evidence in chief, in the form of witness statements in the manner required by practice note 9 of 2021 together with any documents upon which it intends to rely by 15 May 2025.
THAT the matter be listed for a further conciliation conference not before Friday 16 May 2025.
THAT there be liberty to apply.
Commissioner T Kucera