1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy Kelly Llewell-Johnson v James Lawrie (U2025/18927) DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON SYDNEY, 3 JUNE 2026 Application for relief from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587(1)(c) at the Commission’s initiative - application has no reasonable prospects of success. [1] On 30 November 2025 Kelly Llewell-Johnson made an unfair dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). [2] For the following reasons I am satisfied that Ms Llewell-Johnson’s application has no reasonable prospects of success and should be dismissed. [3] In her Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application Ms Llewell-Johnson indicated that she commenced employment with James Lawrie on 12 May 2025 and that her dismissal took effect on 8 November 2025. On the information provided by Ms Llewell-Johnson, she was employed for 5 months, 3 weeks and 6 days. [4] Sections 382 and 383 of the Act provide that a person is only eligible to make an unfair dismissal application if they have completed a minimum period of employment before their dismissal. Section 383 defines the minimum employment period to be either 6 months or 12 months, depending on whether the respondent was a small business employer at the time of the dismissal. On the information provided by Ms Llewell-Johnson the period of employment was less than 6 months. [5] Commission staff attempted to contact Ms Llewell-Johnson on 5 December 2025, 10 December 2025, 9 January 2026, 28 January 2026 and 13 February 2026 by SMS and email regarding the Minimum Employment Period. [6] Ms Llewell-Johnson responded, however did not provide any additional relevant information that supports that she had served the minimum employment period. [7] Ms Llewell-Johnson has been on notice of the likely consequences if she does not provide further information that supports her eligibility to make the application. [2026] FWC 2044 DECISION [2026] FWC 2044 2 [8] To date Ms Llewell-Johnson has not provided any further information that supports her eligibility to make the application. Section 587 – General Principles [9] Section 587 allows the Commission to dismiss an application on the Commission’s own initiative in the early stages of the proceedings. Protracted proceedings can be avoided when there is no reasonable prospect of an outcome other than the dismissal of the application. [10] The power under s.587 should be used with caution, particularly if the matter involves complex questions of fact or law (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [11]-[16] (Bond)). An application should not be dismissed under s.587 unless it is very clear that there are no reasonable prospects of success. As such the power under s.587 is not available if there are disputed facts that could affect the outcome of the proceedings. [11] Importantly, applicants must be given a fair opportunity to show that their application does in fact have some reasonable prospects of success. Does Ms Llewell-Johnson’s application have any reasonable prospects of success? [12] The Commission cannot consider the fairness of Ms Llewell-Johnson’s dismissal until it is clear that she is eligible to make an unfair dismissal claim. [13] The information provided by Ms Llewell-Johnson on her Form F2 application strongly indicates that she is not eligible to make an unfair dismissal application because she does not appear to have served the minimum employment period. [14] Ms Llewell-Johnson had the opportunity to provide information that could show that she had in fact completed the minimum employment period. However Ms Llewell-Johnson has not provided any information that is consistent with her having done so. Ms Llewell-Johnson has also had the opportunity to put her case for consideration on all matters material to the decision to dismiss the application under s.587 (see Bond at [15]-[16]). [15] I am satisfied that Ms Llewell-Johnson’s claim has no reasonable prospect of success within the meaning of s.587(1)(c), and that it is appropriate in the circumstances to dismiss her application on the Commission’s own initiative using the facility available in s.587(3)(a). I make the following order: A. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Kelly Llewell-Johnson’s on 30 November 2025 is dismissed. [2026] FWC 2044 3 DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR810662>