Gabriel Peterson Das Chagas v MacMahon Contractors
Deputy President Easton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Gabriel Peterson Das Chagas
Respondent: MacMahon Contractors
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Archived text (185 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.372—General protections Gabriel Peterson Das Chagas v MacMahon Contractors (C2024/5655) DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON SYDNEY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2024 Application to deal with other contraventions dispute – application dismissed. [1] On 11 August 2024 Mr Gabriel Peterson Das Chagas made a general protections application not involving dismissal to the Fair Work Commission under s.372 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). [2] Mr Peterson Das Chagas’ application was not made in accordance with the Act (per s.587(1)(a)) because the prescribed fee (per s.373) has not been paid or waived. Section 587 confers a discretion on the Commission to dismiss Mr Peterson Das Chagas’ application. [3] Mr Peterson Das Chagas has been given ample opportunity to rectify the deficiency in the application (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [15]-[16] and the cases cited therein). [4] In the circumstances I am satisfied that Mr Peterson Das Chagas’ application should be dismissed. [5] I order that Mr Peterson Das Chagas’ application be dismissed. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR779477> [2024] FWC 2601 DECISION