LANE v ALLEN BJ PSYCHOLOGIST
the Equal Opportunity Commission
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: LANE
RESPONDENT: ALLEN BJ PSYCHOLOGIST
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Cases cited in this decision · 2
Cited
[2000] WAIRC 1051
(not in corpus)
"…WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. PARTIES ZAINAB (ZEE) LANE, APPLICANT v. ALLEN BJ PSYCHOLOGIST, RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER J F GREGOR DELIVERED THURSDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2000 FILE NO APPLICATION 427...…"
Cited
[2000] WAIRC 892
(not in corpus)
"…why the application should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. THAT if the Applicant fails to show cause in writing within the time specified in paragraph 1 hereof the application will be dismissed. (Sgd.)...…"
Archived text (308 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. PARTIES ZAINAB (ZEE) LANE, APPLICANT v. ALLEN BJ PSYCHOLOGIST, RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER J F GREGOR DELIVERED THURSDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2000 FILE NO APPLICATION 427 OF 2000 CITATION NO. 2000 WAIRC 01051 _________________________________________________________________________ Result procedural _________________________________________________________________________ Order. WHEREAS on 19th June 2000 the Commission conducted a conference in this matter during which it was advised that there proceedings before the Equal Opportunity Commission based upon the same incident; and WHEREAS the Commission adjourned the matter for three months on the basis that at the conclusion of that time it would be listed for mention; and WHEREAS by a Notice of Hearing issued on 20th October 2000 the matter was listed for hearing at 9:15am on 2nd No- vember 2000; and WHEREAS the Commission concludes the Notice of Hear- ing was validly given; and WHEREAS there was no appearance by the Applicant on 2nd November 2000 at the hearing; and WHEREAS Mr Curlewis (of counsel) who appeared for the Respondent moved that the application be dismissed; and WHEREAS the Commission has decided that the Appli- cant should within fourteen days of the date hereof be required to show cause why the application should not be dismissed for want of prosecution; and WHEREAS the Commission has decided that if the Appli- cant fails to show cause within the prescribed time the application will be dismissed. NOW THEREFORE pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Industrial Relations Act, 1979, the Commission, hereby orders— 1. THAT the Applicant be required to show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date hereof why the application should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. THAT if the Applicant fails to show cause in writing within the time specified in paragraph 1 hereof the application will be dismissed. (Sgd.) J. F. GREGOR, [L.S.] Commissioner. 2000 WAIRC 00892