Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

United Workers' Union v The Recruitment Place (Vic) Pty Ltd, TLH National Pty Ltd, Bapcor Logistics Services Pty Ltd

[2025] FWC 3495 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: United Workers' Union
Respondent: The Recruitment Place (Vic) Pty Ltd, TLH National Pty Ltd, Bapcor Logistics Services Pty Ltd

Ratio

The Commission was required to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order under s 306E of the Fair Work Act because all statutory conditions were satisfied: TRP and TLH supplied employees to perform work for Bapcor at the Worksite, the Agreement would apply if Bapcor employed them directly, Bapcor is not a small business employer, the work is supply of labour not services (as Bapcor directs, supervises and controls the work while the labour hire companies have minimal involvement), and no submissions were made suggesting it would be unfair and unreasonable to make the order.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 10

  • TRP and TLH each employ regulated employees who perform warehousing and logistics work at Bapcor's contract logistics facility at Redbank, Queensland
  • The regulated employees perform the same work as Bapcor's direct employees, including manual handling, unloading and reloading trucks, picking, packing, receiving and dispatching orders
  • Bapcor directs, supervises, controls and assigns work to the regulated employees
  • The regulated employees receive on-the-job training from Bapcor's officers and employees
  • The regulated employees follow Bapcor's policies and procedures and utilise Bapcor's equipment
  • The regulated employees work alongside Bapcor's direct employees and are rostered to work the same shifts
  • The Vehicle Repair, Services and Retail Award 2020 covers these employees
  • The Bapcor QLD Distribution Centre Agreement 2024 would apply to these employees if they were employed directly by Bapcor
  • All parties filed responses indicating they neither objected to the application nor wished to raise other issues
  • Bapcor, TRP and TLH agreed to a statement of agreed facts

Factors

For
  • TRP and TLH provide their respective employees to perform work for Bapcor at the Worksite
  • The Agreement would apply to TRP and TLH's employees if Bapcor were to employ these employees directly to undertake the same kind of work
  • Bapcor is not a small business employer
  • The performance of work is supply of labour rather than provision of a service
  • Bapcor directs, supervises, controls and assigns work to the regulated employees
  • TRP and TLH have no involvement in matters relating to the regulated employees' performance of work at the Worksite
  • The regulated employees receive the same induction and training as direct Bapcor employees
  • The work does not involve specialist or professional nature
  • The UWU is an organisation entitled to represent the industrial interests of the affected employees
  • No submissions were made suggesting it would be unfair and unreasonable to make the order
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(1A)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(7)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(7A)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(7)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(8)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.306E(9)

Concept tags · 5

[P]Regulated workers (gig / road transport) [S]Modern award (federal) [S]Enterprise agreement approval [S]Standing to bring application [S]Small business employer

Principles · 3

articulates para 7
In determining whether the performance of work is supply of labour or provision of a service under s 306E(1A), the matters in s 306E(7A) are relevant, including the level of control and direction by the host employer, the involvement of the labour hire company in the work, professional standards, and the specialist nature of the work.
articulates para 9
A regulated labour hire arrangement order must be made if the statutory conditions in s 306E(1) are satisfied and the Commission is not satisfied under s 306E(2) that it would be unfair and unreasonable to make the order.
cites para 4 · from [2024] FWCFB 299
A Full Bench outlined principles concerning the proper interpretation and application of s 306E regarding regulated labour hire arrangement orders.

Cases cited in this decision · 1

Cited
[2024] FWCFB 299 — Callide Mine Union Enterprise Agreement 2021
"…tters specified in s 306E(9) of the FW Act. The operative date of the order will be today, 21 November 2025, consistent with s 306E(9)(e)(ii). PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer...…"
Archived text (1164 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.306E—Application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order Application by United Workers’ Union re Bapcor Logistics Services (LH2025/38) JUSTICE HATCHER, PRESIDENT SYDNEY, 21 NOVEMBER 2025 Application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order in respect of The Recruitment Place (Vic) Pty Ltd and TLH National Pty Ltd in relation to work performed for Bapcor Logistics Services Pty Ltd. [1] The United Workers’ Union (UWU) has applied under s 306E of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) for a regulated labour hire arrangement order to apply to Bapcor Logistics Services Pty Ltd (Bapcor) as the regulated host and The Recruitment Place (Vic) Pty Ltd (TRP) and TLH National Pty Ltd (TLH) as the employers. The proposed order would apply to employees (regulated employees) of TRP and TLH who perform work at the contract logistics facility at 15 Northcott Place at Redbank in Queensland operated by Bapcor (Worksite). The covered employment instrument is the Bapcor QLD Distribution Centre Agreement 2024 (Agreement).1 [2] Bapcor, TRP and TLH each filed a Form F86A response to the application indicating that they neither objected to the application nor wished to bring any other issue with it to the Commission’s attention. No other person has indicated an interest in the application. [3] On 22 September 2025, the UWU filed a statement of agreed facts on behalf of all parties to the matter pursuant to my direction issued on 25 August 2025. On the basis of the application, the responses and the statement of agreed facts, I make the following findings: • TRP and TLH each employ regulated employees who perform warehousing and logistics work for Bapcor at the Worksite, including manual handling, unloading and reloading trucks, picking, packing, receiving and dispatching orders to customers, RF scanner use, applying packaging labels, manual and electronic operation of pallet jacks and forklift operations. • The Vehicle Repair, Services and Retail Award 20202 (Award) covers these employees. • The classifications in the Agreement correspond to those in the Award as follows: [2025] FWC 3495 DECISION [2025] FWC 3495 2 Agreement classification Award classification Level 1 Team Member Vehicle industry RS&R—employee— Level 4 R4 Level 2 Team Member Vehicle industry RS&R—employee— Level 5 R5 Level 3 Team Member Vehicle industry RS&R—employee— Level R5 • At the Worksite, the regulated employees work alongside and perform the same work as employees of Bapcor covered by the classifications in Part 5 (Classification Structure) of the Agreement. • The regulated employees: o receive on-the-job training from Bapcor’s officers and employees; o are allocated duties by Bapcor’s officers and employees and are required to comply with Bapcor’s instructions or directions; o are required to follow Bapcor’s policies and procedures; o utilise Bapcor’s equipment, including but not limited to RF scanner guns, pallet jacks and forklifts; o at Bapcor’s direction, take breaks per the Agreement; o access the same rooms as Bapcor’s employees, including lunchrooms and toilets; o are generally rostered to work the same rostered shifts as Bapcor’s direct employees; o receive the same induction to the worksite and work health and safety o protocol upon commencement as Bapcor’s employees; o attend team meetings and team talks with Bapcor’s employees; o are expected to follow Bapcor’s code of conduct; and o do not perform duties that can be said to be specialist or expert in nature. Consideration [4] In Application by the Mining and Energy Union,3 a Full Bench of the Commission outlined a number of principles concerning the proper interpretation and application of s 306E.4 I apply, but do not repeat, the principles stated in that decision. [5] The parties agree, and I am satisfied for the purposes of s 306E(7) of the FW Act, that the UWU is an organisation entitled to represent the industrial interests of employees of TRP and TLH who perform work at the Worksite. Accordingly, the UWU is entitled to apply for a regulated labour hire arrangement order under s 306E of the FW Act by operation of s 306E(7)(c). [6] I am likewise satisfied that the requirements of s 306E(1) of the FW Act, which must be satisfied in order to enliven the obligation to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order, are met. Specifically, on the evidence before me, I am satisfied that: (a) TRP and TLH provide their respective employees to perform work for Bapcor at the Worksite. [2025] FWC 3495 3 (b) The Agreement would apply to TRP and TLH’s employees who perform work for Bapcor at the Worksite if Bapcor were to employ these employees directly to undertake the same kind of work. (c) Bapcor is not a small business employer. [7] For the purposes of s 306E(1A) of the FW Act, I am satisfied that the performance of work is not and will not be for the provision of a service, rather than the supply of labour. In forming this view, I have had regard to the matters set out in subsection (7A). In relation to the matters set out in s 306E(7A), I make the following findings: (a) There is no evidence that TRP or TLH has any involvement in matters relating to the regulated employees’ performance of work at the Worksite. (b) Rather, the evidence demonstrates that Bapcor directs, supervises, controls and assigns work to employees of TRP and TLH at the Worksite. (c) The regulated employees receive the same induction and training as direct Bapcor employees, from Bapcor employees, and work within Bapcor’s policies and procedures at the Worksite. They operate equipment belonging to Bapcor. (d) There is no evidence that either TRP or TLH is or will be subject to industry or professional standards or responsibilities in relation to the work of its employees supplied to Bapcor. (e) The work undertaken by the regulated employees at the Worksite involves the operation of equipment within Bapcor’s systems, but does not involve work of a specialist or professional nature. [8] In relation to s 306E(2) of the FW Act, I am not satisfied that it is not fair and reasonable in all the circumstances to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order as sought by the UWU. Section 306E(2) requires the Commission to have regard to the matters listed in subsection (8) in relation to which submissions have been made. In this case, no submissions were made in relation to any of the matters listed in subsection (8). Accordingly, I am not required to have regard to those matters. [9] In those circumstances, I am required by s 306E of the FW Act to make the regulated labour hire arrangement order sought by the UWU. I will publish the order together with this [2025] FWC 3495 4 decision, setting out the matters specified in s 306E(9) of the FW Act. The operative date of the order will be today, 21 November 2025, consistent with s 306E(9)(e)(ii). PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR793975> 1 AE526060. 2 MA000089. 3 [2024] FWCFB 299, 333 IR 249. 4 Ibid [8]–[17].