Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees REC Maintenance & Construction Pty Ltd Trading AS Altrad

[2025] FWC 2178 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Commissioner Schneider
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: REC Maintenance & Construction Pty Ltd Trading AS Altrad

Ratio

The FWC made an order under s.318 of the Fair Work Act that the expired MAS Australasia Pty Ltd Employee Agreement 2016 should not cover the new employer (Altrad) and the transferring employees, and instead the REC–Altrad Chevron Facilities Agreement 2024 should apply to them. The order was granted because the transferring employees had agreed to the transfer and accepted employment contracts reflecting the new agreement's terms, all employees would receive better terms and conditions, there was no substantive opposition, the new agreement improved productivity by consolidating multiple instruments on the same site, and the outcome reflected a properly bargained agreement consistent with the Act's bargaining objectives.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 10

  • 13 employees (Rope Access Technicians) were previously employed by MAS Australasia Pty Ltd and covered by the MAS Australasia Pty Ltd Employee Agreement 2016
  • The employees transferred to REC Maintenance & Construction Pty Ltd Trading AS Altrad
  • The employees perform the same work at Chevron LNG facilities in Western Australia
  • The transferring employees agreed to transfer and accepted contracts of employment replicating the REC–Altrad Chevron Facilities Agreement 2024 effective from 18 December 2024
  • The Altrad Agreement was negotiated with the Australian Workers Union (AWU) and another group of employees performing the same work at the same sites
  • The transferable instrument (MAS Agreement 2016) expired on 20 August 2020
  • The Altrad Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 18 December 2028
  • Transferring employees are already paid in line with the Altrad Agreement
  • All employees receive significantly better terms and conditions under the new agreement compared to prior employment
  • The Commission issued directions requiring the applicant to provide materials to affected employees; no employees or unions filed substantive objections

Factors

For
  • Transferring employees agreed to transfer and accepted contracts replicating the Altrad Agreement
  • No substantive objections received from affected employees or unions despite opportunity to respond
  • Transferring employees receive significantly better terms and conditions than under the previous agreement
  • All employees already paid in line with Altrad Agreement
  • Consolidating under single instrument improves workplace productivity by eliminating multiple agreement administration
  • Altrad Agreement provides later nominal expiry date (2028 vs 2020), providing greater industrial stability
  • Altrad Agreement reflects actual rates of pay and terms at relevant Chevron facilities
  • Agreement is a properly bargained outcome reflecting bargaining objectives of the Act
  • Consolidation is in public interest by ensuring employees covered by single instrument reflecting actual rates
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.318
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.311
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.313(1)(a)

Concept tags · 5

[P]Enterprise agreement variation [P]Transmission of business (Pt 2-8) [S]Procedural fairness at dismissal stage [S]Modern award (federal) [S]Good faith bargaining

Principles · 4

articulates para 11
When determining whether to make a s.318 order, the FWC must consider: the views of the new employer and affected employees; whether employees would be disadvantaged in their terms and conditions; the nominal expiry date of the transferable instrument; whether the transferable instrument would negatively impact productivity of the new employer's workplace; whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage; the degree of business synergy between instruments; and the public interest.
articulates para 18
Consolidation of multiple enterprise agreements covering the same site into a single instrument improves workplace productivity by reducing administrative steps in payroll, human resources, and finance systems.
articulates para 23
The fact that affected employees have agreed to transfer and accepted contracts reflecting terms of the new enterprise agreement is a significant consideration favouring the making of a s.318 order.
cites para 11
The FWC has discretion to make a s.318 order but must consider specified statutory factors: views of parties, employee disadvantage, nominal expiry date, productivity impact, economic disadvantage, business synergy, and public interest.
Archived text (1576 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees REC Maintenance & Construction Pty Ltd Trading AS Altrad (AG2025/2029) Manufacturing and associated industries COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER PERTH, 4 AUGUST 2025 S.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees. Transferable instrument: MAS Australasia Pty Ltd Employee Agreement 2016. New instrument: REC – Altrad Chevron Facilities Agreement 2024. [1] REC Maintenance & Construction Pty Ltd Trading AS Altrad (Altrad or the Applicant) has applied to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for an Order in relation to a transfer of business. [2] The transferable instrument in this matter is the MAS Australasia Pty Ltd Employee Agreement 2016 (the Transferable Instrument).1 The application also concerns the REC – Altrad Chevron Facilities Agreement 2024 (the Altrad Agreement).2 Background [3] The order sought in the application relates to 13 employees (the Transferring Employees) engaged by Altrad as Rope Access Technicians. [4] The Transferring Employees are engaged to complete work at Chevron LNG facilities in Western Australia. [5] Prior to the Transferring Employees’ engagement with Altrad, they were employed by MAS Australasia Pty Ltd. [6] The Transferring Employees are covered by the Transferable Instrument. [7] The Applicant seeks the following orders: • The Transferable Instrument shall not cover or apply to the Applicant. • The order applies to the Transferring Employees. [2025] FWC 2178 DECISION [2025] FWC 2178 2 • The Altrad Agreement, which covers the Applicant, shall instead cover the Transferring Employees and apply to them when they are working under its scope. Legislation [8] Section 318 of the Act provides: “318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees Orders that the FWC may make (1) The FWC may make the following orders: (a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee; (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee. Who may apply for an order (2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following: (a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; (b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee; (c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement; (d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b). Matters that the FWC must take into account (3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following: (a) the views of: (i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and (ii) the employees who would be affected by the order; (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment; (c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement; (d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace; (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer; (f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer; (g) the public interest. Restriction on when order may come into operation [2025] FWC 2178 3 (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following: (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; (b) the day on which the order is made.” Consideration Preliminary matters [9] I am satisfied that the Applicant is entitled to make this application as the new employer; the Transferring Employees will perform the same or substantially the same work for the Applicant; and there is a transfer of business within the meaning of section 311 of the Act. [10] The effect of the order sought by the Applicant would be that the Transferable Instrument would not cover the Applicant or any of the Transferring Employees. And, instead, the Altrad Agreement would apply to the Transferring Employees. [11] Section 318 of the Act provides that the Commission has discretion to make the Order and in determining whether to make the order, I must consider each of the matters in section 318(3) of the Act. I will now turn to consider these matters. The views of the new employer [12] The Applicant, being the new employer, is clearly supportive of the application. The views the employees who would be affected by the order and whether they would be disadvantaged by the order [13] The Applicant submits the following in relation to this criterion: • The 13 Transferring Employees who will be affected by the making of the order agreed to transfer to Altrad. They did so by accepting contracts of employment which replicated the terms of Altrad Agreement, which were effective from 18 December 2024. • The Altrad Agreement was negotiated with the Australian Workers Union (AWU) and another group of employees who perform the same work at the same sites as the Transferring Employees. • The AWU, employee bargaining representatives, and the Applicant agreed for the Transferring Employees to be offered employment by Altrad and the Applicant agreed to seek these orders pursuant to section 318 of the Act. • The Transferring Employees are already paid in line with the Altrad Agreement. The Altrad Agreement is a negotiated agreement which sets out employees’ actual terms and conditions. • All employees receive a significantly better set of terms and conditions than they did prior to the Altrad Agreement being approved by the Commission. [2025] FWC 2178 4 • No employee will suffer a disadvantage in terms and conditions as a result of the making of this order. [14] The Commission issued Directions to the Applicant, which read as follows: “1. The Applicant is required to provide a copy of the following material to affected employees, copied to the Fair Work Commission, by no later than 4:00PM, 8 July 2025. i. A copy of these directions; and ii. A copy of the Form F40 Application with attachments. 2. Any affected employees or Unions wishing to be heard must file in the Fair Work Commission, and serve a copy on the Applicant, by no later than 4:00PM 15 July 2025: i. Submissions in relation to the application; and/or ii. Other materials in relation to the application. 3. In the event the Commission receives material from any affected employees or Unions wishing to be heard, the Applicant will be provided with an opportunity to file any material in reply.” [15] The Applicant complied with the requirements of the Directions. The Commission did not receive any views of substance in response to the application. The nominal expiry date of the agreement [16] The Transferable Instrument expired on 20 August 2020. The Altrad Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 18 December 2028. [17] The Applicant submits that the later nominal expiry date of the newer enterprise agreement provides greater industrial stability to both the Applicant and the Transferring Employees moving forward. Whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace [18] The Applicant submits the following in response to this consideration: • Employing staff under multiple enterprise agreements on the same site has a negative impact on productivity. Doing so creates additional steps in reporting and administering payroll, Human Resources, and finance related systems. The making of this order will improve productivity for the Applicant. Whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer [19] The Applicant makes no submissions regarding this consideration. [2025] FWC 2178 5 The degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that covers the new employer [20] Noting that the Transferable Instrument provides for lower rates of pay and less beneficial terms and conditions, the Applicant submits that the Altrad Agreement it seeks to cover the Transferring Employees reflects the actual rates of pay and terms and conditions in place at the relevant facilities. The public interest [21] The Applicant submits that it is in the public interest to grant the order for the following reasons: • It will result in employees being covered by a single instrument which reflects the actual rate of pay and terms when they are working for Altrad companies at Chevron Facilities. • The Altrad Agreement is a properly bargained outcome which reflects the bargaining objectives of the Act. [22] I am satisfied that granting the order would not be contrary to the public interest. Conclusion [23] In consideration of all the circumstances, and importantly noting the contracts accepted by the Transferring Employees, I am satisfied that the order sought should be made. The Order has been issued concurrently.3 COMMISSIONER Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <AE420668 PR790045> 1 [AE420668]. 2 [AE527318]. 3 [PR790046].