Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v KONE Elevators Pty Ltd

[2025] FWC 1910 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Commissioner Crawford
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)
Respondent: KONE Elevators Pty Ltd

Ratio

The Commission approved a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, finding that all requirements in s.443(1) were met where the applicant union had genuinely engaged in bargaining with the employer and had provided enforceable commitments addressing the employer's public health and safety objections.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 8

  • CEPU made application on 2 July 2025 for protected action ballot order under s.437 FW Act
  • KONE objected on public health and safety grounds
  • Parties engaged in negotiations on 2 July 2025, continuing during private conference
  • CEPU provided commitments to KONE on the record during hearing
  • KONE withdrew its opposition to the application following the commitments
  • Jake Sutton (CEPU Organiser) declared that union had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with KONE
  • Ballot period closes 17 July 2025 (10 working days from order)
  • Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd approved to conduct ballot under s.468A

Factors

For
  • Declaration of Jake Sutton evidencing genuine attempts at bargaining
  • CEPU provided enforceable commitments addressing employer's safety concerns
  • Employer withdrew opposition following commitments
  • All requirements under s.443(1) FW Act satisfied
  • Notification time requirement in relation to proposed agreement met
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A

Concept tags · 3

[P]Protected action ballot order [S]Good faith bargaining [S]PCBU primary duty of care (WHS)

Principles · 2

articulates para 6
For a protected action ballot order under s.437 to be granted, the Commission must be satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the FW Act have been met.
articulates para 6
Evidence of genuine bargaining efforts by the union, combined with enforceable commitments addressing an employer's safety concerns, can satisfy the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot order.
Archived text (479 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v KONE Elevators Pty Ltd (B2025/1078) COMMISSIONER CRAWFORD SYDNEY, 3 JULY 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of KONE Elevators Pty Ltd [1] On 2 July 2025, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made an application under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of KONE Elevators Pty Ltd (KONE). [2] Later in the day on 2 July 2025, the Commission was advised that KONE objected to the application on public health and safety grounds. [3] Given KONE’s opposition, I listed a hearing via video on 3 July 2025. [4] The parties had engaged in further negotiations ahead of the hearing on 3 July 2025, those negotiations then continued during a private conference while the hearing was adjourned. [5] The CEPU ultimately agreed to provide commitments to KONE on the record during the hearing. Based on the commitments provided by the CEPU, KONE withdrew its opposition to the application. [6] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jake Sutton (Organiser) setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with KONE and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with KONE, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the FW Act have been met. [7] The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the FW Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [2025] FWC 1910 DECISION [2025] FWC 1910 2 [8] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the FW Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 17 July 2025.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the FW Act. [9] An Order has been separately issued in PR788883. [10] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. COMMISSIONER Appearances: Mr A Aghazarian for the CEPU. Mr P Smith for KONE. Hearing details: 2025. Sydney (via video using Microsoft Teams). 3 July. Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR788882> 1 This is 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.