Brandon Quinn v Axicorp Financial Services Pty Ltd, Simon Hodgkiss & Rajesh Yohannan
Deputy President Roberts
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Brandon Quinn
Respondent: Axicorp Financial Services Pty Ltd, Simon Hodgkiss & Rajesh Yohannan
Ratio
The application was made under Fair Work Act s.365 to deal with contraventions involving dismissal. The substantive decision on the merits is not reported in this judgment. This decision concerns only a confidentiality order made under s.594 in relation to communications regarding the applicant's views on legal issues and communications between the respondent and its legal representatives.
Outcome
Resolved
other
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 7
- Application made on 5 December 2024 under Fair Work Act Pt 3-1 relating to alleged contraventions involving dismissal
- Application was reference C2024/8896
- First Respondent filed an application for confidentiality orders under s.594
- Confidential Information consisted of references in Form F8 to communications regarding the Applicant's views on legal issues relating to the First Respondent and communications between the First Respondent and its legal representatives
- Parties conferred and consented to the form of confidentiality order
- Hearing conducted on the papers
- Order published with decision on 10 January 2025
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.365
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 3-1
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.594
Concept tags · 3
Archived text (204 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal Mr Brandon Quinn v Axicorp Financial Services Pty Ltd, Simon Hodgkiss & Rajesh Yohannan (C2024/8896) DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS SYDNEY, 10 JANUARY 2025 Confidentiality orders [1] On 5 December 2024 the present application was made under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The First Respondent to the application subsequently filed an application for confidentiality orders under s.594 of the Act. The First Respondent considers that certain paragraphs in the Form F8 application contain references to communications regarding the Applicant’s views on legal issues relating to the First Respondent, and references to communications between the First Respondent and its legal representatives (referred to in the accompanying order as the Confidential Information). [2] The parties have conferred in relation to the application for confidentiality orders and have consented to the form of order accompanying this decision. [3] I am satisfied that it is desirable to make an order in the terms sought. [4] An order under s594 of the Act will be published with this decision. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Hearing details: On the Papers [2025] FWC 92 DECISION [2025] FWC 92 2 Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR783178>