Mathew Edward Brown v Aeroklas Asia Pacific Group Pty Ltd
Deputy President Dobson
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Mathew Edward Brown
Respondent: Aeroklas Asia Pacific Group Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 3
Archived text (132 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy Mathew Edward Brown v Aeroklas Asia Pacific Group Pty Ltd (U2025/16676) DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON BRISBANE, 16 FEBRUARY 2026 Application for unfair dismissal remedy - s.394 - harsh, unjust or unreasonable - Applicant on period of sick leave - Independent Medical Examination from Psychiatrist declared fitness to engage in disciplinary process - whether sufficient time to respond - whether procedurally fair - dismissal not unfair - application dismissed Further to my decision and reasons given on transcript on 16 February 2026, I order that the application lodged by Mr Mathew Edward Brown under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) is dismissed. DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR796787> [2026] FWC 483 DECISION