Jayden Payne v Great Northern Hotel (NSW) Pty Ltd
Deputy President Easton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Jayden Payne
Respondent: Great Northern Hotel (NSW) Pty Ltd
Ratio
The applicant's unfair dismissal application was dismissed under s.587(1)(c) on the Commission's own initiative because the applicant did not have a reasonable prospect of success: he had been employed for approximately 5 months, which is less than the 6-month minimum employment period required by s.383, and despite being given opportunity to provide further information, he failed to do so.
Outcome
Against applicant
dismissed
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 8
- Applicant commenced employment with respondent on 18 February 2025
- Dismissal took effect on 7 August 2025
- Total period of employment: 5 months, 2 weeks and 6 days
- Applicant indicated on Form F2 the dates of commencement and dismissal
- Commission staff contacted applicant on 28 August 2025 and 21 October 2025 by telephone, SMS and email regarding minimum employment period
- Applicant responded to contact but did not provide information supporting eligibility
- Applicant was on notice of consequences of failure to provide further information
- No additional information was provided to support eligibility
Factors
For
Against
- Applicant employed for only 5 months, 2 weeks and 6 days, which is less than the 6-month minimum employment period
- No information provided by applicant indicating he had completed the minimum employment period
- Despite opportunity and contact from Commission, applicant did not provide supporting evidence of eligibility
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.382
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.383
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.394
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.587(1)(c)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.587(3)(a)
Concept tags · 5
Principles · 7
articulates para 9
Section 587 allows the Commission to dismiss an application on the Commission's own initiative in the early stages of proceedings to avoid protracted proceedings when there is no reasonable prospect of an outcome other than dismissal.
articulates para 10
The power under s.587 should be used with caution, particularly if the matter involves complex questions of fact or law, and an application should not be dismissed under s.587 unless it is very clear that there are no reasonable prospects of success.
articulates para 10
The power under s.587 is not available if there are disputed facts that could affect the outcome of the proceedings.
articulates para 11
Applicants must be given a fair opportunity to show that their application does in fact have some reasonable prospects of success.
articulates para 12
The Commission cannot consider the fairness of a dismissal until it is clear that the applicant is eligible to make an unfair dismissal claim.
cites para 10
The power under s.587 should be used with caution, particularly if the matter involves complex questions of fact or law, and an application should not be dismissed under s.587 unless it is very clear that there are no reasonable prospects of success.
cites para 14
Applicants must be given a fair opportunity to show that their application has reasonable prospects of success, including the opportunity to put their case on all matters material to the decision to dismiss.
Cases cited in this decision · 1
Cited
[2024] FWC 1302
— Alan Geoffrey Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge
"…le prospect of an outcome other than the dismissal of the application. [10] The power under s.587 should be used with caution, particularly if the matter involves complex questions of fact or law (see generally Bond...…"
Archived text (709 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.394—Unfair dismissal Jayden Payne v Great Northern Hotel (NSW) Pty Ltd (U2025/13866) DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON SYDNEY, 13 JANUARY 2026 Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587(1)(c) at the Commission’s initiative - application has no reasonable prospects of success. [1] On 26 August 2025, Mr Jayden Payne made an unfair dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). [2] For the following reasons I am satisfied that Mr Payne’s application has no reasonable prospects of success and should be dismissed. [3] In his Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application Mr Payne indicated that he commenced employment with Great Northern Hotel (NSW) Pty Ltd on 18 February 2025 and that his dismissal took effect on 7 August 2025. On the information provided by Mr Payne, he was employed for 5 months, 2 weeks and 6 days. [4] Sections 382 and 383 of the Act provide that a person is only eligible to make an unfair dismissal application if they have completed a minimum period of employment before their dismissal. Section 383 defines the minimum employment period to be either 6 months or 12 months, depending on whether the respondent was a small business employer at the time of the dismissal. On the information provided by Mr Payne the period of employment was less than 6 months. [5] Commission staff attempted to contact Mr Payne on 28 August and 21 October 2025 by telephone, SMS and email regarding the Minimum Employment Period. [6] Mr Payne responded, however did not provide any additional relevant information regarding whether he had served the minimum employment period. [7] Mr Payne has been on notice of the likely consequences if he does not provide further information that supports his eligibility to make the application. [2026] FWC 97 DECISION AND ORDER [2026] FWC 97 2 [8] To date Mr Payne has not provided any further information that supports his eligibility to make the application. Section 587 – General Principles [9] Section 587 allows the Commission to dismiss an application on the Commission’s own initiative in the early stages of the proceedings. Protracted proceedings can be avoided when there is no reasonable prospect of an outcome other than the dismissal of the application. [10] The power under s.587 should be used with caution, particularly if the matter involves complex questions of fact or law (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [11]-[16] (Bond)). An application should not be dismissed under s.587 unless it is very clear that there are no reasonable prospects of success. As such the power under s.587 is not available if there are disputed facts that could affect the outcome of the proceedings. [11] Importantly, applicants must be given a fair opportunity to show that their application does in fact have some reasonable prospects of success. Does Mr Payne’s application have any reasonable prospects of success? [12] The Commission cannot consider the fairness of Mr Payne’s dismissal until it is clear that he is eligible to make an unfair dismissal claim. [13] The information provided by Mr Payne on his Form F2 application strongly indicates that he is not eligible to make an unfair dismissal application because he does not appear to have served the minimum employment period. [14] Mr Payne had the opportunity to provide information that could show that he had in fact completed the minimum employment period. However Mr Payne has not provided any information that is consistent with him having done so. Mr Payne has also had the opportunity to put his case for consideration on all matters material to the decision to dismiss the application under s.587 (see Bond at [15]-[16]). [15] I am satisfied that Mr Payne’s claim has no reasonable prospect of success within the meaning of s.587(1)(c), and that it is appropriate in the circumstances to dismiss his application on the Commission’s own initiative using the facility available in s.587(3)(a). I make the following order: [2026] FWC 97 3 A. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Jayden Payne on 26 August 2025 is dismissed. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR795812>