Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited and Suez Water Pty Ltd T/A Watersure
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Respondent: Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited and Suez Water Pty Ltd T/A Watersure
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 6
Archived text (493 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited and Suez Water Pty Ltd T/A Watersure (B2026/773) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 3 JULY 2026 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited and SUEZ Water Pty Ltd trading as Watersure – non-AEC ballot agent electronic voting [1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Suez Water Pty Ltd and Ventia Utility Services Pty Ltd trading as Watersure (Watersure or Employer). [2] I note that the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) have made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. 1 [3] On 2 July 2026, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the application. [4] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [5] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Peter Mooney, Branch Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Watersure, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [6] The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 1 B2026/769 and B2026/772, respectively. [2026] FWC 2528 DECISION [2026] FWC 2528 2 [7] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 17 July 2026.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR811760. [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR811758> 2 This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.