Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Alliance Airlines Pty Limited, Bravo Airlines Pty Limited
Commissioner Platt
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Transport Workers' Union of Australia
Respondent: Alliance Airlines Pty Limited, Bravo Airlines Pty Limited
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 8
Archived text (493 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Alliance Airlines Pty Limited, Bravo Airlines Pty Limited (B2024/1487) COMMISSIONER PLATT ADELAIDE, 20 NOVEMBER 2024 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Alliance Airlines Pty Limited & Bravo Airlines Pty Limited [1] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU or Applicant) has made an application under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Alliance Airlines Pty Limited & Bravo Airlines Pty Limited (the Employers). [2] I note the Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP)1 has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. [3] On 19 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Respondent objected to question 7 of the draft order. The matter was subsequently scheduled for Conference at 4.30pm (SA) on 19 November 2024. The Respondent did not attend and the matter was adjourned to 20 November 2024 for Conference and Hearing. [4] At 9:00am (SA) on 20 November 2024 I conciliated the matter. Ms Biviano represented the Applicant, Ms Hignett represented the Respondent and Mr Mattner represented AFAP. During conciliation, the Respondent advised it withdrew its objection. Both parties advised that they did not object to a Consent Order being made in the terms proposed. [5] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Edward Nell, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the TWU in bargaining with the Employers and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [6] The ballot is to be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote). TrueVote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [2024] FWC 3197 DECISION [2024] FWC 3197 2 [7] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 4 December 2024.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR781421. [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. COMMISSIONER Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR781422> 1 B2024/1488. 2 This is, in effect, 14 calendar days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.