Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Workers' Union v Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd

[2024] FWC 3077 Fair Work Commission 2024-01-01
Source
Deputy President Wright
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Workers' Union
Respondent: Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 9

[P]Notice of termination (statutory/contract) [P]Enterprise agreement approval [P]Enterprise agreement variation [P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [P]Unprotected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Conciliation and arbitration powers [S]Declaration
Archived text (461 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Australian Workers' Union v Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd (B2024/1436) DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT SYDNEY, 6 NOVEMBER 2024 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd [1] This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd (Sodexo or Employer). [2] On 6 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended following discussions between the parties. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jason Lipscombe, National Organiser, Oil and Gas, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Sodexo, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 20 November 2024.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 5 working days applies to the items listed within Clause five (5) of the Order. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR781009. [2024] FWC 3077 DECISION [2024] FWC 3077 2 [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR781010> 1 This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific date sought in the application.