Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Respondent: Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 5
Archived text (519 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd (B2024/946) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 26 JULY 2024 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd [1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd (Schindler or Employer). [2] On 26 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Bravo, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Schindler, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 9 August 2024.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] The CEPU has advised that they will provide the following safety undertaking in the issue of any notices of industrial action authorised by the ballot: [2024] FWC 1983 DECISION [2024] FWC 1983 2 “The CEPU undertakes to ensure that in an emergency situation where there is a risk to personal health and safety and where no other workers are available, CEPU members will be available to perform work. CEPU members will not engage in industrial action that would endanger the life, personal safety, health or welfare of the population or part thereof.” [8] The CEPU has also committed to further discussions with Schindler around safety issues and processes in the event that its members decide to engage in protected industrial action. [9] An Order has been separately issued in PR777548. [10] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR777549> 1 This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.