Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Health Services Union Victoria No. 3 Branch T/A The Victorian Allied Health Professionals Association v RSL CARE RDNS Limited T/A Bolton Clarke

[2024] FWC 1611 Fair Work Commission 2024-01-01
Source
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Health Services Union Victoria No. 3 Branch T/A The Victorian Allied Health Professionals Association
Respondent: RSL CARE RDNS Limited T/A Bolton Clarke
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 6

[P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [P]Unprotected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Conciliation and arbitration powers [S]Declaration
Archived text (482 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Application for a protected action ballot order Health Services Union Victoria No. 3 Branch T/A The Victorian Allied Health Professionals Association v RSL CARE RDNS Limited T/A Bolton Clarke (B2024/783) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2024 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of RSL CARE RDNS Limited T/A Bolton Clarke [1] This is an application by the Health Services Union Victoria No. 3 Branch T/A The Victorian Allied Health Professionals Association (HSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of RSL CARE RDNS Limited T/A Bolton Clarke (Bolton Clarke or Employer). [2] On 19 June 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Lindsay Ryan, Assistant Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the HSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bolton Clarke, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote). TrueVote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 July 2024.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking certain forms of industrial action set out in questions 12 and 13 of Clause 5 the Order [2024] FWC 1611 DECISION [2024] FWC 1611 2 made by the Commission. The default period of three working days written notice will apply to the remaining forms of action arising from the ballot question. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR776216. [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR776217> 1 This is, in effect, fifteen (15) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.