Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Civil Aviation Safety Authority

[2023] FWC 2145 Fair Work Commission 2023-01-01
Source
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia
Respondent: Civil Aviation Safety Authority
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 7

[P]Enterprise agreement approval [P]Enterprise agreement variation [P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Conciliation and arbitration powers [S]Declaration

Cases cited in this decision · 1

Cited
[2023] FWC 1400 — Application for approval as an eligible protected action ballot agent...
"…Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR765580> 1...…"
Archived text (398 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (B2023/884) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 28 AUGUST 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Civil Aviation Safety Authority [1] This is an application by the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA or Union) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA or Employer). [2] On 28 August 2023, the Commission was advised that CASA did not, in effect, object to the Application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Kathleen Studdert, Union official of APESMA, setting out the steps taken by the APESMA in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with CASA, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act1 and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 September 2023.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] An Order has been separately issued in PR765581. [8] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the [2023] FWC 2145 DECISION [2023] FWC 2145 2 attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR765580> 1 Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400 2 This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date effect of the Order.