[2023] FWC 1831 The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 26 July 2023. Respondent’s name amended to delete erroneous trading name. TF Associate to Deputy President Beaumont Dated 27 July 2023 1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Woodside Energy Limited (B2023/743) DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT PERTH, 26 JULY 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Woodside Energy Limited [1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made under s 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Woodside Energy Limited (the Respondent). [2] On 26 July 2023, the Commission was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application, but did seek an extension of the notice period to seven days in accordance with s 414(2)(b) of the Act. The Respondent submitted that based on an agreed position of the parties the Commission could be satisfied that there are ‘exceptional circumstances’ warranting such extension. [3] Based on the materials filed and observing the agreed position of the parties, I considered it appropriate to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] Regarding whether the circumstances warrant an extension to the notice period, I have found that they do. Section 443(5) of the Act provides that the Commission can require a longer period of notice to be given where it is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying this. The onus is on the Respondent to provide evidence that would satisfy the Commission that there are exceptional circumstances in this instance. To warrant an extended period of notice, the Commission must be satisfied both as to the existence of exceptional circumstances and the fact that these justify the granting of the extended notice. [5] It is uncontroversial that the expression ‘exceptional circumstances’ was considered by Lawler VP in Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Postal Corporation,1 and in National Tertiary Education Industry Union v Charles Darwin University, the Full Bench concluded that the Vice President’s discussion was apposite to the phrase ‘exceptional circumstances justifying’ in s 443(5).2 Having considered the meaning to be attributed to that expression and in light of the materials filed, I have found that exceptional circumstances exist within the [2023] FWC 1831 DECISION [2023] FWC 1831 2 meaning of s 443(5) of the Act. It is plainly apparent that the external environment in which the Respondent operates the gas processing facilities of which it is a part owner, is challenging. In my view, the circumstances so described in the materials justify the extension of the notice period up to seven working days. I have therefore extended the notice period accordingly. [6] I further observe that based on the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Adam Woodage, CEPU Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s 443(1) of the Act have been met. [7] The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has recently been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act3 and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. For the purposes of s 443(3)(c) and s 448A(2) of the Act, a ballot period of ten (10) working days from the date of the Order (26 July 2023) has been approved by the Commission. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR764567. [9] The matter will shortly be listed for a s 448A conference. An order requiring the bargaining representatives’ attendance at the conference will thereafter be issued. It is likely that directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Matter determined on the papers. Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR764568> 1 (2007) 167 IR 4. 2 [2018] FWCFB 4011, [20]–[21]. 3 Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.