Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) v B&D Australia Pty Ltd T/A B & D Doors

[2023] FWC 1311 Fair Work Commission 2023-01-01
Source
Deputy President Clancy
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
Respondent: B&D Australia Pty Ltd T/A B & D Doors
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 4

[P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Declaration
Archived text (241 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) v B&D Australia Pty Ltd T/A B & D Doors (B2023/525) DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY MELBOURNE, 5 JUNE 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of B&D Australia Pty Ltd Trading As B & D Doors [1] This is an application by the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of B&D Australia Pty Ltd T/A B & D Doors Limited (Respondent). [2] On 2 June 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Andrew Bonello of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An order has been separately issued in PR762768. DEPUTY PRESIDENT <PR762767> [2023] FWC 1311 DECISION