Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd T/A Maules Creek Open Cut Mine

[2023] FWC 864 Fair Work Commission 2023-01-01
Source
Vice President Catanzariti
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
Respondent: Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd T/A Maules Creek Open Cut Mine
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 5

[P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Declaration [S]Mining / resources sector
Archived text (239 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd T/A Maules Creek Open Cut Mine (B2023/328) VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI SYDNEY, 11 APRIL 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd T/A Maules Creek Open Cut Mine [1] This is an application by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd (Respondent). [2] On 11 April 2023, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Jeremy McWilliams of the Applicant declared on 6 April 2023, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An Order has been separately issued in PR761011. VICE PRESIDENT [2023] FWC 864 DECISION [2023] FWC 864 2 Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR761012>