United Workers’ Union v JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd T/A JB Hi-Fi
Deputy President Clancy
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: United Workers’ Union
Respondent: JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd T/A JB Hi-Fi
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Archived text (215 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action United Workers’ Union v JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd T/A JB Hi-Fi (B2023/327) DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY MELBOURNE, 6 APRIL 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd [1] This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of JB Hi-Fi Group Pty Ltd trading as JB Hi-Fi (Respondent). [2] On 6 April 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Bella Himmelreich of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An order has been separately issued in PR760967. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR760966> [2023] FWC 851 DECISION