Australian Workers' Union v Graincorp Operations Limited
Vice President Catanzariti
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Workers' Union
Respondent: Graincorp Operations Limited
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Archived text (214 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action The Australian Workers' Union v Graincorp Operations Limited (B2023/292) VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI SYDNEY, 4 APRIL 2023 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Graincorp Operations Limited [1] This is an application by the Australian Workers' Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Graincorp Operations Limited (Respondent). [2] On 3 April 2023, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Sean Burke of the Applicant declared on 29 March 2023, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An Order has been separately issued in PR760865. VICE PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer [2023] FWC 813 DECISION [2023] FWC 813 2 <PR760866>