Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards objective Health sector awards – Pandemic Leave

[2020] FWCFB 3834 Fair Work Commission (Full Bench) 2020-01-01
Source
Commissioner Lee
Not yet cited by other cases
Treatment by later cases (5)
5 neutral
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 6.2
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 1

[P]Wages — payment obligations

Cases cited in this decision · 1

Cited
[2020] FWCFB 3561 — Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2020
"…risk of health and care workers being infected or having to self- isolate emerged. [2] There has been a significant change in circumstances since our 8 July 2020 decision was issued. Information at hand as at 21 July...…"

Subsequent treatment · 5

Cited / considered· 5

Cited
[2020] FWCFB 7059 FWC — Full Bench — FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards...
Cited
[2020] FWCFB 5578 FWC — Full Bench — FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards...
Cited
[2020] FWCFB 3940 FWC — Full Bench — FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards...
Cited
[2020] FWCFB 3906 FWC — Full Bench — FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards...
Cited
[2020] FWCFB 4327 FWC — Full Bench — Nurses Award 2010

Workplace Express coverage · 1

Surging coronavirus cases in Victoria have today prompted an FWC full bench to seek urgent submissions on a provisional view that it should now vary the aged care award to provide paid pandemic leave for employees, including casuals, who must self-isolate. Submissions are invited by midday Friday on the provision, which would entitle employees to take up to two weeks' paid leave each time they are required to self-isolate because they display symptoms of COVID-19 or have come into contact with a person suspected of having contracted it. Vice President Adam Hatcher, deputy presidents Richard Clancy and Lyndall Dean and commissioners Paula Spencer and Tim Lee earlier this month adjourned the union bid to introduce the leave for health and community workers reliant on various health awards (see Related Article). The bench found at the time that the ACTU's claim would have "very little effect" in the public health sector, where most workers are not in the federal system or are covered by enterprise agreements. But granting paid pandemic leave would have a "significant effect" in residential aged care and social and community services, causing financial difficulty particularly for employers in the subsidised aged care and NDIS-funded disability sectors, it said. "The overriding factor we have taken into account is that, in the current circumstances, the degree of success in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic means that the elevated potential risk to health and care workers of actual or suspected exposure to infection has not manifested itself in actuality," the bench said early this month. Clear "elevated risk" in the aged care industry In a statement published today the full bench says there has been a "significant change in circumstances" since its July 8 decision, including 296 new COVID-19 cases in a 24-hour period reported on Monday, bringing the total to more than 3000. Of these, it notes there are 125 active cases in government-subsidised residential aged care, all in Victoria, where 40 aged care homes have at least one active case. Of the 216 active cases overall that are connected to aged care facilities, some 93 are staff. Meanwhile a government announcement on Monday confirmed funding for aged care facilities to ensure staff do not work across multiple centres or homes, "without such staff being disadvantaged as a result". The bench says its current "provisional view is that the developments. . . would justify the grant of a paid pandemic leave provision" in the aged care award. "We consider that the 'elevated risk' that is discussed in our earlier decision has clearly manifested itself in the aged care industry, at least in Victoria," it says. The bench says its provisional view is that the leave entitlement must also extend to casual employees, as it believes the developments "indicate the existence of a demonstrated threat to the aged care system in Victoria". If established, the bench says it considers the leave would "apply to casual employees engaged on a regular and systematic basis, and would entitle them to payment based on an average of their earnings over the previous six weeks". "The entitlement would initially be established for a temporary period of three months." $1500 entitlement might be an adequate alternative The bench highlighted the Victorian Government's announcement on July 20 that it would provide a one-off $1,500 payment to support aged care workers directed to self-isolate or quarantine at home because of a COVID-19 diagnosis or their close contact with a confirmed case, but have no entitlement to sick leave while absent from work (Premier Daniel Andrews today urged those entitled to the payment to call 1800 675 398 to secure it). "It may be that the contemplated scheme of payment referred to in the [Victorian Government] announcement would constitute an adequate substitute for any award variation to provide for paid pandemic leave that we might make and/or that the announcement reflects an industry consensus reached between governments, employers and unions as to how the current situation in the aged care industry in Victoria should appropriately be dealt with. "Further information is required to allow us to properly assess the position in that respect," the bench said in today's statement. Statement – Health sector awards – Pandemic Leave [2020] FWCFB 3834 (22 July 2020) Home page - Health sector awards – pandemic leave
Archived text (1083 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.157 - FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards objective Health sector awards – Pandemic Leave (AM2020/13) VICE PRESIDENT HATCHER DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN COMMISSIONER SPENCER COMMISSIONER LEE SYDNEY, 22 JULY 2020 Health sector awards – Pandemic Leave [1] In our decision issued on 8 July 2020,1 we determined that we would not at that time grant applications made by a number of unions to vary identified “Health awards”2 to provide for paid pandemic leave. On a fairly fine balance, we determined that we were not at that time satisfied that the grant of the unions’ application was necessary to achieve the modern awards objective in s 134(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). The overriding factor in reaching that conclusion was the degree of success at that point in time in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, which meant that the elevated potential risk to health and care workers of actual or suspected exposure to infection had not manifested itself in actuality. However, we did not dismiss the application because we accepted expert evidence that the position in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to radically change in a matter of weeks, and we pointed to then-recent developments in Victoria as representing a disturbing development. We determined that the appropriate course was to stand the matter over on the basis that it might be relisted on the request of any party at short notice. We also stated that we would ourselves monitor developments and might relist the matter of our own initiative if we considered it necessary. We also indicated that we might be prepared to grant the application at least in part in respect of some of the Health awards (including the Aged Care Award 2010) if evidence emerged that an elevated risk of health and care workers being infected or having to self- isolate emerged. [2] There has been a significant change in circumstances since our 8 July 2020 decision was issued. Information at hand as at 21 July 2020 discloses the following: 1 [2020] FWCFB 3561 2 Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2010; Aged Care Award 2010; Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2010; Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2010; Medical Practitioners Award 2010; Nurses Award 2010; Pharmacy Industry Award 2010; Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010; Supported Employment Services Award 2010. [2020] FWCFB 3834 STATEMENT 2 there were 296 new cases in the last 24 hours, of which 275 were in Victoria; there have been 17 additional deaths since 8 July 2020; of the total of 123 deaths in Australia, 106 have been aged 70 years or over, and 40 have been residents of Australian government-subsidised residential aged care; there are currently 3,026 active COVID-19 cases, of which 156 are hospitalised and 33 are in intensive care; there are 125 active cases in Australian government-subsidised residential aged care, all of which are in Victoria; at least 40 different aged care homes in Victoria have at least one active case, which number has doubled in 5 days; 216 active cases in Victoria have been connected to aged care facilities, of which 112 are residents, 93 are staff and 11 are household contacting residents, staff and household contacts; and the Australian Government announced on 20 July 2020 that federal and state governments would provide funding to help aged care facilities ensure that aged care staff do not work across multiple centres or homes without such staff being disadvantaged as a result. [3] There has additionally been an announcement published on 20 July 2020 of a one-off $1,500 payment to financially support Victorian aged care workers who have been instructed to self-isolate or quarantine at home because they are either diagnosed with COVID-19 or are a close contact of a confirmed case, but cannot rely on sick leave while absent from work.3 [4] Our provisional view is that the developments described in paragraph [2] above would justify the grant of a paid pandemic leave provision in the Aged Care Award 2010 of the type foreshadowed in paragraph [131] of our decision of 8 July 2020 – that is, a provision entitling employees to up to two weeks’ paid leave on each occasion they are required to self-isolate because they display symptoms of COVID-19 or have come into contact with a person suspected of having contracted COVID-19. We consider that the “elevated risk” that is discussed in our earlier decision has clearly manifested itself in the aged care industry, at least in Victoria. We have also formed the provisional view that it would be necessary to extend any such entitlement to casual employees, since we consider that the developments we have set out indicate the existence of a demonstrated threat to the aged care system in Victoria. In that connection we have in mind that if such an entitlement was established, it would apply to casual employees engaged on a regular and systematic basis, and would entitle them to payment based on an average of their earnings over the previous six weeks. The entitlement would initially be established for a temporary period of three months. [5] However, in determining whether we should proceed to vary the Aged Care Award 2010 in accordance with our provisional view, it will be necessary to take into account the 3 Media release of the Hon Greg Hunt MP, Commonwealth Minister for Health, published 20 July 2020 3 announcement described in paragraph [3] above. It may be that the contemplated scheme of payment referred to in the announcement would constitute an adequate substitute for any award variation to provide for paid pandemic leave that we might make and/or that the announcement reflects an industry consensus reached between governments, employers and unions as to how the current situation in the aged care industry in Victoria should appropriately be dealt with. Further information is required to allow us to properly assess the position in that respect. [6] We invite interested parties, and relevant government ministers and authorities, to file written submissions responding to the provisional views expressed in paragraph [4] and [5] above, and to provide further information concerning the contemplated scheme of payment referred to in the announcement of 20 July 2020. Because of the obvious urgency in this matter, we direct that any such submissions and information be filed by 12.00pm on Friday 24 July 2020. VICE PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR721177>