Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) v Thales Australia Limited

[2020] FWC 1133 Fair Work Commission 2020-01-01
Source
Deputy President Gostencnik
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
Respondent: Thales Australia Limited
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 4

[P]Protected action ballot order [P]Protected industrial action [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Declaration
Archived text (235 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) v Thales Australia Limited (B2020/125) DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK MELBOURNE, 2 MARCH 2020 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Thales Australia Limited. [1] This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Thales Australia Limited (Respondent). [2] On 2 March 2020, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr B Terzic of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An order has been separately issued in PR717168. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR717167> [2020] FWC 1133 DECISION [2020] FWC 1133 2