United Workers’ Union v Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Onelink
Vice President Catanzariti
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: United Workers’ Union
Respondent: Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Onelink
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 3
Archived text (215 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437—Protected action United Workers’ Union v Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Onelink (B2020/15) VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI SYDNEY, 10 JANUARY 2020 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Onelink. [1] This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Onelink (Respondent). [2] On 10 January 2020, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declarations of Mathew Toner of the Applicant declared on 9 January 2020, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and are, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] An Order has been separately issued in PR715854. VICE PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR715855> [2020] FWC 150 DECISION