Adrian Doyle v Mandurah Catholic College
Commissioner Walkington
Positively treated
Treatment by later cases (5)
2 positive
3 neutral
Citation timeline
2020
2022
Applicant: Adrian Doyle
Respondent: Roman Catholic Bishop of Bunbury
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Outcome
Procedural
respondent_amended
Authority signal
Positively treated
Signal-weighted score: 6.1
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 1
Subsequent treatment · 5
Positive treatment· 2
Applied
(2021) 101 WAIG
WAIRC — Single Commissioner
— N INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION CITATION : 2021 WAIRC 00054 CORAM :...
Cited / considered· 3
Cited
(2020) 100 WAIG
WAIRC — Single Commissioner
— ON NO. 2019 WAIRC 00847 Result Direction issued Representation Ms Z...
Considered
¶10
Archived text (112 words)
CONTRACTUAL BENEFIT CLAIM
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
PARTIES Adrian Doyle
APPLICANT
-v-
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF BUNBURY
RESPONDENT
CORAM Commissioner T B Walkington
DATE Wednesday, 1 July 2020
FILE NO/S B 167 OF 2019
CITATION NO. 2020 WAIRC 00385
Result Name of respondent amended
Representation
Applicant Mr A Doyle
Respondent Mr I Curlewis (of counsel)
Order
HAVING heard from the applicant on his own behalf and Mr I Curlewis (of counsel) on behalf of the respondent, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, hereby orders:
THAT the name of the respondent be amended to ‘Roman Catholic Bishop of Bunbury’.
Commissioner T B Walkington