MacDonald, Scott Francis v Secure Corp
Commissioner Smith
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: MacDonald, Scott Francis
Respondent: Secure Corp
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 5
Archived text (282 words)
PR927329
PR927329
Download Word Document
AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Workplace Relations Act 1996
s.170CE
application for relief in respect of termination of employment
Scott MacDonald
and
SECUREcorp
(U2002/6311)
COMMISSIONER SMITH
MELBOURNE, 4 FEBRUARY 2003
Termination of employment.
EX TEMPORE DECISION
[1]
The following decision, now edited, was issued during proceedings conducted on 17 January 2003.
[2]
In this matter, Mr Scott MacDonald seeks relief pursuant to section 170CK of the
Workplace Relations Act 1996
. Mr MacDonald commenced employment on 17 August 2002 and was subsequently dismissed with effect on 4 November 2002. The employer, SECUREcorp Pty Ltd, has moved for the dismissal of the matter pursuant to section 170CEA, the grounds being that Mr MacDonald was serving a period of probation, determined in advance.
[3]
The facts of the matter are plain and uncontested. On 14 August Mr MacDonald was given a contract of employment to consider and on 16 August he signed that contract. Clause 22 of the contract provided:
Probation Period. You will be employment on probation for a period of three months. At any time during that probationary period either you or the employer can terminate this agreement by providing one week's notice in writing or that notice can be paid in lieu.
[4]
Against that background I find that the application by Mr MacDonald is excluded by section 170CC of the
Workplace Relations Act
1996
read in conjunction with regulation 30B(1)(c) of the Act.
[5]
Accordingly, the application is struck out.
BY THE COMMISSION:
COMMISSIONER
Appearances:
S MacDonald
the applicant
.
T Rowe
with
M Scott
on behalf of SECUREcorp.
Hearing details:
2003.
Melbourne:
January, 17.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code B>