Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Mr Justice Brinsden, Mr Justice Smith. Friday 11th April, 1980. Order. HAVING heard Mr D. H. Schapper of Counsel for the v Mr D. W. Newnes of Counsel for the

(1980) 60 WAIG Industrial Appeal Court 1980-01-01 File: No. 11 of 1979
Source
Mr
Not yet cited by other cases
APPELLANT: Mr Justice Brinsden, Mr Justice Smith. Friday 11th April, 1980. Order. HAVING heard Mr D. H. Schapper of Counsel for the
RESPONDENT: Mr D. W. Newnes of Counsel for the
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 5

[S]Unfair dismissal (WA) [S]Unfair dismissal (federal) [S]Costs order [S]Reopening evidence [S]Internal appeals (FB, FWCFB)
Archived text (187 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL APPEAL COURT. Appeal No. 11 of 1979. In the matter of an appeal from the decision of an Industrial Magistrate given on 18th October, 1979, in Complaint No. 787 of 1979. Between Licensed Car Salesmen's Association, Union of Workers, of Western Australia, Appellant, and Ballogie Pty Ltd and Canclar Nominees Pty Ltd trading as Wagon World, Respondent. Before: Mr Justice Wallace (Presiding Judge), Mr Justice Brinsden, Mr Justice Smith. Friday 11th April, 1980. Order. HAVING heard Mr D. H. Schapper of Counsel for the appellant and Mr D. W. Newnes of Counsel for the respondent in the appeal herein, the Court doth hereby order that— (1) The order of Mr C. N. Boys, Esq, Industrial Magistrate, given on 18th October, 1979, whereby the complaint herein was dismissed ^0 §0^, ssicIG* (2) The complaint be remitted to Mr C. N. Boys, Esq, Industrial Magistrate with a direction that the complainant be permitted to reopen its case to adduce evidence as to the identity of the respondent; (3) There be no order as to costs. (Sgd.) R. R. ELLIS, [L.S.] Clerk of the Court. IN THE