e Industrial Relations Act binding only the parties to the agreement; And whereas the Commission believes that it is appropri- ate that an order so issue; And having heard Mr M. Lourey on behalf of the v Mr J. Uphill and Mr A. Nelson on behalf of the
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: e Industrial Relations Act binding only the parties to the agreement; And whereas the Commission believes that it is appropri- ate that an order so issue; And having heard Mr M. Lourey on behalf of the
RESPONDENT: Mr J. Uphill and Mr A. Nelson on behalf of the
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 2
Archived text (421 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. Industrial Relations Act 1979. The Forest Products, Furnishing and Allied Industries, Industrial Union of Workers, W.A. and Joyce Australia. No. C 666 of 1992. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 26 November 1992. Order. WHEREAS the applicant union applied for a conference pursuant to section 44 of the Industrial Relations Act concerning a dispute between it and the respondent company concerning work to be performed by eleven employees on a contract constructing playground equipment for the Building Management Authority (the BMA Contract); And whereas the parties reached agreement on the matter at a conference held on the 23rd day of November 1992; And whereas the parties agreed that their agreement is without prejudice to the positions of the parties on a future occasion; And whereas the parties have placed written details of the agreement and the work to be performed on the record of the proceedings; And whereas the parties have requested that an order issue pursuant to section 44(8)(a) of the Industrial Relations Act binding only the parties to the agreement; And whereas the Commission believes that it is appropri- ate that an order so issue; And having heard Mr M. Lourey on behalf of the Applicant and Mr J. Uphill and Mr A. Nelson on behalf of the Respondent; Now therefore, I the undersigned, pursuant to the powers conferred on me under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, and by consent, hereby order— That notwithstanding the terms of clause 8.—Wages, clause 13.—Hours and clause 14.—Overtime of the Furniture Trades Industry Award No. A 6 of 1984, the employees listed below shall whilst performing work upon the BMA Contract be paid in accordance with the terms of the agreement between the parties, a copy of which has been placed on the record of proceedings in substitution for those terms. Andrew Chlebinski John Masters Alan Figveria John Lupis Vince Martino Steve Doyle Boz Bubanic Dave Loke Colin Beard Jim Dillon Charlie Taylor. (Sgd.) A.R. BEECH, [L.S.] Commissioner. and Datacraft Australia Pty Ltd. No. C 649 of 1991. COMMISSIONER S.A. KENNEDY. 14 February 1992. Order. WHEREAS this is an application brought pursuant to section 44(7)(a)(iii) of the Industrial Relations Act 1979; and Whereas the facts asserted by the Applicant are to the effect that the qualifying period of employment for the purposes of the entitlement claimed has not been completed; Now therefore I the undersigned pursuant to the powers conferred by the Industrial Relations Act 1979 do hereby order— That this application be and is dismissed. (Sgd.) S.A. KENNEDY, [L.S.] Commissioner.