Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Pty Ltd. No. 600 of 1992. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 20 October 1992. Order. HAVING heard Mr R.W. Clohessy on behalf of the v Mr P. Robertson on behalf of the

(1992) 72 WAIG Single Commissioner (WAIRC) 1992-10-20 File: No. 600 of 1992
Source
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: Pty Ltd. No. 600 of 1992. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 20 October 1992. Order. HAVING heard Mr R.W. Clohessy on behalf of the
RESPONDENT: Mr P. Robertson on behalf of the
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 7

[P]Annual leave [P]Denied contractual benefits (WA s29(1)(b)) [P]Jurisdictional objection [S]Unfair dismissal (WA) [S]Unfair dismissal (federal) [S]Wages — payment obligations [S]Costs order
Archived text (245 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. Industrial Relations Act 1979. Marlene Halls and Austware Pottery (Australia) Pty Ltd. No. 600 of 1992. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 20 October 1992. Order. HAVING heard Mr R.W. Clohessy on behalf of the applicant and Mr P. Robertson on behalf of the respondent, the Commission pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, hereby orders— 1. That the claim of the applicant submitted under the heading "Telephone Accounts" be dismissed. 2. That the claims of the applicant under the headings of "Advertising", "Austware:Beau Monde" and "Budget" be struck out for want of jurisdiction. 3. That the respondent shall pay to the applicant the sum of $3,998.00 by way of denied contractual benefit regarding re-location costs. 4. That the respondent shall pay to the applicant a sum of money being denied contractual benefit for annual and pro ram annual leave for the period between the 18th March 1991 to the 29th April 1992, except for the period between the date of the applicant's arrival in Perth and the re-opening of the respondent's business following the Christmas close-down in December 1991—January 1992. 5. That the total amount to be paid to the applicant by the respondent shall be reduced by an amount equal to one week's wages calculated as at the 29th April 1992. 6. That there be liberty to apply in respect of the calculations to be made in order 4. hereof. (Sgd.) A.R. BEECH, [L.S.] Commissioner.