Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Relations Act 1979. John Hay and Gardner Perrott a Division of Brambles Australia Limited No. 727 of 1995. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 22 February 1996. Order. HAVING heard Ms J Harrison on behalf of the v Mr G Dietrich on behalf of the

(1996) 76 WAIG Single Commissioner (WAIRC) 1996-02-22 File: No. 727 of 1995
Source
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: Relations Act 1979. John Hay and Gardner Perrott a Division of Brambles Australia Limited No. 727 of 1995. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 22 February 1996. Order. HAVING heard Ms J Harrison on behalf of the
RESPONDENT: Mr G Dietrich on behalf of the
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 3

[P]No work, no pay [P]Annual leave [S]Wages — payment obligations
Archived text (263 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. Industrial Relations Act 1979. John Hay and Gardner Perrott a Division of Brambles Australia Limited No. 727 of 1995. COMMISSIONER A.R. BEECH. 22 February 1996. Order. HAVING heard Ms J Harrison on behalf of the applicant and Mr G Dietrich on behalf of the respondent, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act, 1979 hereby orders: 1. THAT Gardner Perrott pay Mr Hay for the periods he was incorrectly stood down in April 1993, Octo- ber 1993 and April 1994. WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 739 76 W.A.I.G. 2. THAT the payment to be made in Order 1. hereof: (a) be for the days that Mr Hay would have worked had he not been stood down; (b) be reduced by any payment for annual leave made to him for those periods; (c) be reduced by the amount of any other income received by Mr Hay during those periods; (d) be at the rate of wage Mr Hay would have received if he had been employed by Gardner Perrott on-shore for those periods. 3. THAT liberty is reserved to the parties to have the Commission determine the amount of payment to be made to Mr Hay in accordance with this Order in the event that the parties are unable to agree on the amount. 4. THAT the claim for payment for the period in May 1995 be adjourned sine die and may be relisted upon the written request of Mr Hay, with notice of that request to Gardner Perrott. (Sgd.) A.R. BEECH, [L.S] Commissioner.