PARTIES ROBERT JAMES COLEMAN JNR & HENRY THOMAS COLEMAN v R.J. COLEMAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: PARTIES ROBERT JAMES COLEMAN JNR & HENRY THOMAS COLEMAN
RESPONDENT: R.J. COLEMAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Cases cited in this decision · 2
Cited
[2001] WAIRC 3984
(not in corpus)
"…RTIES ROBERT JAMES COLEMAN JNR & HENRY THOMAS COLEMAN, APPLICANT v. R.J. COLEMAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD, RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER S J KENNER DELIVERED WEDNESDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2001 FILE NO/S APPLICATION 950 OF 2001 &...…"
Cited
[2001] WAIRC 4042
(not in corpus)
"…by 11 January 2002. 6. THAT the matters be heard and determined together and be listed together for hearing for 1 day. 7. THAT the parties have liberty to apply on short no- tice. (Sgd.) S.J. KENNER, [L.S.]...…"
Archived text (372 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION. PARTIES ROBERT JAMES COLEMAN JNR & HENRY THOMAS COLEMAN, APPLICANT v. R.J. COLEMAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD, RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER S J KENNER DELIVERED WEDNESDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2001 FILE NO/S APPLICATION 950 OF 2001 & APPLICATION 951 OF 2001 CITATION NO. 2001 WAIRC 03984 _________________________________________________________________________ Result Direction issued. Representation Applicant Mr S Lemonis of counsel Respondent Mr R Harrison of counsel _________________________________________________________________________ Direction. HAVING heard Mr S Lemonis of counsel for the applicant and Mr R Harrison of counsel for the respondent the Com- mission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act, 1979, hereby directs— 1. THAT the applicants shall file and serve amended notices of application in the terms of the applicant’s contracts of employment with the respondent by 30 October 2001. 2. THAT the respondent produce for inspection by the applicants by 6 November 2001 the following docu- ments— (a) All documents relating to the terms of em- ployment of the applicants. (b) All documents relating to the wages paid by the respondent to the applicants for the pe- riod 13 September 2000 to the present date. (c) All documents relating to the wages paid to Irene Margaret Coleman Jnr and Phillipa Mary Coleman during the period 13 September 2000 to 22 August 2001. (d) All documents relating to the allegations that the applicants were absent from the workplace. 3. THAT evidence in chief in this matter be adduced by way of signed witness statements which will stand as the evidence in chief of the maker. Evidence in chief other than that contained in the witness state- ments may only be adduced by leave of the Commission. 4. THAT the respondent file and serve any signed wit- ness statements upon which it intends to rely by 28 December 2001. 5. THAT the applicants file and serve any signed wit- ness statements upon which they intend to rely by 11 January 2002. 6. THAT the matters be heard and determined together and be listed together for hearing for 1 day. 7. THAT the parties have liberty to apply on short no- tice. (Sgd.) S.J. KENNER, [L.S.] Commissioner. PUBLIC SERVICE APPEAL BOARD— 2001 WAIRC 04042 AGAINST THE DECISION TO TERMINATE MADE ON 5/1/2001