Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

WAIRC 00114 Result Award varied Representation Ms E Palmer on behalf of the Mr A Harper on behalf of the Order HAVING heard Ms E Palmer on behalf of the v Mr A Harper on behalf of the

(2007) 87 WAIG Single Commissioner (WAIRC) 2007-02-14
Source
Not yet cited by other cases
APPLICANT: WAIRC 00114 Result Award varied Representation Applicant Ms E Palmer on behalf of the applicant Respondent Mr A Harper on behalf of the respondent Order HAVING heard Ms E Palmer on behalf of the
RESPONDENT: Mr A Harper on behalf of the
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 2

[S]Overtime and penalty rates [S]Costs order

Cases cited in this decision · 1

Cited
[2007] WAIRC 114 (not in corpus)
"…ION PARTIES LIQUOR, HOSPITALITY AND MISCELLANEOUS UNION, WESTERN AUSTRALIAN BRANCH APPLICANT -v- DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & LAND MANAGEMENT RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER S WOOD DATE WEDNESDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2007 FILE...…"
Archived text (487 words)
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION PARTIES LIQUOR, HOSPITALITY AND MISCELLANEOUS UNION, WESTERN AUSTRALIAN BRANCH APPLICANT -v- DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & LAND MANAGEMENT RESPONDENT CORAM COMMISSIONER S WOOD DATE WEDNESDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2007 FILE NO APPL 150 OF 2006 CITATION NO. 2007 WAIRC 00114 Result Award varied Representation Applicant Ms E Palmer on behalf of the applicant Respondent Mr A Harper on behalf of the respondent Order HAVING heard Ms E Palmer on behalf of the applicant and Mr A Harper on behalf of the respondent, and by consent, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act, 1979, hereby orders: THAT the Rangers (National Parks) Award no.17 of 1981 as varied, be further varied in accordance with the following Schedule and that such variation shall have effect from the beginning of the first pay period commencing on or after the date of this order. (Sgd.) S WOOD, [L.S.] Commissioner. 482 WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 87 W.A.I.G. SCHEDULE 1. Clause 9. – Overtime: (A) Delete subclause (7)(a) of this clause and insert the following in lieu thereof: (7) (a) An employee required to work continuous overtime for more than one hour shall be supplied with a meal by the employer or be paid $9.70 for a meal, and if owing to the amount of overtime worked, a second or subsequent meal is required he/she shall be supplied with each such meal by the employer or be paid $5.70 each meal so required. (B) Delete subclause (7)(d) of this clause and insert the following in lieu thereof: (d) An employee required to work continuously from midnight to 6.30am and ordered back to work at 8.00am the same day shall be paid $5.00 breakfast. 2. Clause 14. – Conditions and Allowances: (A) Delete subclause (3) of this clause and insert the following in lieu thereof: (3) Mobile Rangers shall, in addition to their normal rate of pay, be paid an allowance of $105.10 per week to offset the costs associated with living in and maintaining a caravan. This allowance is to be moved year to year to reflect the change in CPI for Perth. (B) Delete subclause (4)(c) of this clause and insert the following in lieu thereof: (c) The employee using toxic substances or materials of a like nature shall be paid 56 cents per hour extra. Employees working in close proximity to employees so engaged shall be paid 46 cents per hour extra. (C) Delete subclause (5)(d) of this clause and insert the following in lieu thereof: (d) An employee required to wear protective clothing or equipment for the purpose of this subclause shall be paid 56 cents per hour or part thereof while doing so unless the Union and the employer agree that by reason of the nature of the protective clothing or equipment the employee does not suffer discomfort or inconvenience while wearing it or, in the event of disagreement, the