Fitness Industry Award 2020
Justice Ross
Not yet cited by other cases
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 4
Cases cited in this decision · 3
Cited
[2018] FWCFB 4177
— 4 yearly review of modern awards 4 yearly review of modern awards – plain...
"…ch 2019. No correspondence has been received by ASSA. Accordingly, we will proceed on the basis that ASSA’s claim is not pressed. PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR711023> 1...…"
Cited
[2018] FWC 6091
(not in corpus)
"…dence has been received by ASSA. Accordingly, we will proceed on the basis that ASSA’s claim is not pressed. PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR711023> 1 ASSA Submission , 4...…"
Cited
[2019] FWCFB 1047
(not in corpus)
"…ved by ASSA. Accordingly, we will proceed on the basis that ASSA’s claim is not pressed. PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR711023> 1 ASSA Submission , 4 August 2016. 2 [2018]...…"
Archived text (321 words)
[2019] FWCFB 5428
[2019] FWCFB 5428
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
STATEMENT
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156—4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language re-drafting –
Fitness Industry Award 2010
(AM2016/15, AM2014/227)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT
VICE PRESIDENT HATCHER
COMMISSIONER HUNT
MELBOURNE, 7 AUGUST 2019
4 yearly review of modern awards – plain language re-drafting – Fitness Industry Award 2010.
[1]
This Statement concerns an outstanding claim relating to the Job search entitlement clauses (clauses 14.2 and 14.3, previously clause 14.3) in the
Fitness Industry Award 2010
(Fitness Award).
[2]
During award stage proceedings, the Australian Swim Schools Association (ASSA) submitted that clause 14.3 of the Fitness Award is ambiguous to the extent that it is unclear if the entitlement applies to casual employees.
1
The ASSA submitted the ambiguity may be resolved by varying the clause to clearly state if the entitlement applies or does not apply to casual employees.
[3]
In a Decision
2
issued on 18 July 2018 the Plain Language Full Bench finalised Standard Clause E — Termination of Employment and expressed the
provisional
view that all modern awards should be varied to insert the clause to achieve the modern awards objective. In a Statement
3
issued on 1 October 2018 the Commission confirmed the majority of modern awards, including the Fitness Award, would be varied to incorporate Standard Clause E.
[4]
A Statement
4
regarding ASSA’s claim (outlined at paragraph [2] above) was published on 28 February 2019. That Statement noted that ASSA was to advise the Commission if it wished to press its claim, by 4.00pm, Friday 15 March 2019. No correspondence has been received by ASSA. Accordingly, we will proceed on the basis that ASSA’s claim is not pressed.
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR711023>
1
ASSA
Submission
, 4 August 2016.
2
[2018] FWCFB 4177
.
3
[2018] FWC 6091
.
4
[2019] FWCFB 1047