Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) & Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd

[2025] FWC 3501 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU) and Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU)
Respondent: Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd

Ratio

The FWC granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 where the unions had satisfied all statutory requirements in s.443(1), including demonstration of genuine bargaining efforts, notification time in relation to a proposed agreement, and agreement by consent to extend the minimum written notice period for protected industrial action to five working days on the basis of relevant exceptional circumstances.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 8

  • Applications were made by AMWU and CFMEU for protected action ballot orders in relation to employees of Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd
  • The unions sought to conduct a ballot in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement
  • Separate applications were also made by CEPU and AWU in relation to the same proposed agreement
  • On 21 November 2025, Bechtel advised it did not object to the application subject to an extended written notice period of five working days
  • The unions agreed to the extended notice period on the basis of relevant exceptional circumstances
  • Declarations were provided by Glenn McLaren (AMWU Assistant State Secretary) and Bradley Upton (CFMEU Assistant Secretary) setting out bargaining steps and genuine negotiation efforts
  • Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) was approved as the eligible protected action ballot agent
  • Voting was to close on 4 December 2025

Factors

For
  • Declarations from union officials (Glenn McLaren and Bradley Upton) setting out bargaining steps taken with the employer
  • Evidence that the unions have been genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bechtel
  • Consent of the respondent employer to the application (subject to extended notice period)
  • Existence of a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement
  • Satisfaction of all requirements in s.443(1) of the Act
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(5)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.414(2)(b)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A

Concept tags · 4

[P]Protected action ballot order [S]Enterprise agreement approval [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Protected industrial action

Principles · 2

articulates para 5
For a protected action ballot order to be granted under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, an applicant union must satisfy all requirements in s.443(1), including that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the union has genuinely tried to reach agreement with the employer.
articulates para 8
Relevant exceptional circumstances under s.443(5) may justify extending the minimum period of written notice required under s.414(2)(b) beyond three working days, and such extension may be determined by the Commission.
Archived text (646 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) & Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd (B2025/1754) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 24 NOVEMBER 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd – non-AEC ballot electronic voting [1] This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU), (collectively the Applicants) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd (Bechtel or Employer). [2] I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)1 and the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU)2 have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement. [3] On 21 November 2025, the Respondent advised that it did not object to the application subject to confirmation of there being an extended notice period for the taking of any protected industrial action of five (5) working days in relation to the proposed forms of action. The AMWU and CFMEU, in effect, accepted that there were the relevant exceptional circumstances and both agreed to that amendment. [4] In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [5] On the basis of the material before me, including the declarations of Glenn McLaren, Assistant State Secretary, and Bradley Upton, Assistant Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU and CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that they have been, and are, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bechtel, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [2025] FWC 3501 DECISION [2025] FWC 3501 2 [6] The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [7] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 4 December 2025.3 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [8] Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of any industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot question in clause 5 of the Order. [9] An Order has been separately issued in PR793997. [10] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters if a Protected Action Ballot Order is granted in those matters. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, that Member will issue an Order requiring their attendance in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR793998> 1 B2025/1755. 2 B2025/1756. 3 This is, in effect, 5 working days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.