Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

United Workers' Union v The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government

[2025] FWC 2926 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Deputy President Wright
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: United Workers' Union
Respondent: The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government

Ratio

The FWC granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, as the applicant union had satisfied all requirements in s.443(1), including evidence of genuine bargaining efforts and notification time. An extended written notice period of 7 working days (rather than the statutory minimum of 3) was justified by exceptional circumstances agreed by both parties.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 8

  • Application by United Workers' Union for protected action ballot order under s.437 Fair Work Act 2009
  • Employees of The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government
  • Respondent did not object subject to extended notice period of 7 working days
  • United Workers' Union Secretary Erina Early declared that union genuinely trying to reach agreement with OCPE
  • Ballot to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty (approved ballot agent under s.468A)
  • Voting closure date: 20 October 2025
  • Non-AEC ballot agent electronic voting
  • Matter determined on papers without hearing

Factors

For
  • Evidence of genuine bargaining efforts by union (declaration of Secretary Erina Early)
  • Existence of notification time in relation to proposed agreement
  • All requirements in s.443(1) of the Act satisfied
  • Eligible protected action ballot agent (Fair Vote Services Pty) approved under s.468A
  • Exceptional circumstances justifying extended notice period agreed by both parties
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(5)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.414(2)(b)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A

Concept tags · 3

[P]Protected action ballot order [S]Industrial activity (s347) [S]Good faith bargaining
Archived text (548 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order United Workers' Union v The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government (B2025/1532) DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT SYDNEY, 1 OCTOBER 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government – non-AEC ballot agent electronic voting [1] This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment, Northern Territory Government (OCPE or Employer). I observe that the entity of the Employer in this matter has been amended to reflect the confirmed position of both parties on that issue. [2] On 1 October 2025, the Respondent advised that it did not object to the application subject to confirmation of there being an extended notice period of seven (7) working days in relation to the proposed forms of industrial action. The UWU, in effect, accepted that there were the relevant exceptional circumstances and agreed to that amendment. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Erina Early, Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with OCPE, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 20 October 2025.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [2025] FWC 2926 DECISION [2025] FWC 2926 2 [7] Pursuant to s.443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified seven (7) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR792284. [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR792285> 1 This is, in effect, 14 calendar days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.