Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Workers' Union v Powertech Pty Ltd

[2025] FWC 1462 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Workers' Union
Respondent: Powertech Pty Ltd

Ratio

The FWC granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 on a consent basis, having found that the notification time requirement and all requirements in s.443(1) were satisfied, and that exceptional circumstances justified an extended five working day written notice period for industrial action under s.414(2)(b).

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 7

  • AWU applied for protected action ballot order in relation to employees of Powertech Pty Ltd
  • Powertech did not object to the application following discussions where parties reached a consent position
  • Extended period of notice for taking industrial action was agreed
  • Application was amended and determined on the papers without hearing
  • Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) approved as eligible protected action ballot agent to conduct ballot
  • Voting to close on 12 June 2025
  • Parties agreed to extended written notice period of five (5) working days for industrial action

Factors

For
  • Declaration from Ross Kumeroa, Organiser, demonstrating AWU has been genuinely trying to reach agreement with Powertech
  • Notification time requirement satisfied
  • All requirements in s.443(1) of the Act met
  • Consent position reached between parties
  • Eligible protected action ballot agent (Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd/CiVS) approved under s.468A
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(5)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.414(2)(b)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A

Concept tags · 5

[P]Protected action ballot order [S]Industrial activity (s347) [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Compulsory conference [S]Consent orders

Principles · 1

articulates para 7
Exceptional circumstances may justify an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action, beyond the statutory minimum.
Archived text (501 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Australian Workers' Union v Powertech Pty Ltd (B2025/827) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 28 MAY 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Powertech Pty Ltd [1] This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Powertech Pty Ltd (Powertech or Employer). [2] On 27 May 2025, the Commission was advised that Powertech did not, in effect, object to the Application if amended following discussions between the parties who had reached a consent position on the matter including an extended period of notice for the taking of industrial action. [3] In the circumstances, I have granted leave to amend the application to reflect the agreed position and determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Powertech, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 June 2025.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. By consent, the Commission has specified an extended written notice period of five (5) working days as the [2025] FWC 1462 DECISION [2025] FWC 1462 2 minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order. [8] An Order has been separately issued in PR787711. [9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR787712> 1 This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.