Ayva Armstrong v Ayuda Healthcare Pty Ltd
Deputy President Colman
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Ayva Armstrong
Respondent: Ayuda Healthcare Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 6
Archived text (193 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.365—General protections Ayva Armstrong v Ayuda Healthcare Pty Ltd (C2025/2782) DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN MELBOURNE, 13 MAY 2025 Objection to s 365 application – jurisdictional objection dismissed [1] Earlier today I dismissed a jurisdictional objection to an application made by Ayva Armstrong (applicant) under s 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The respondent, Ayuda Healthcare Pty Ltd, contended that it did not dismiss the applicant, and that it had merely temporarily suspended her from the casual roster pending an investigation into her performance. The applicant said that the company’s service manager told her that she had been taken off the roster, and also that she was no longer required. I accepted the applicant’s account of this conversation and concluded that the applicant had been dismissed by the respondent. Having dismissed the jurisdictional objection, I then conducted a conference to deal with the matter as required by s 368(1) and the matter was resolved. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Appearances: O. Baits for the applicant C. Holt for the respondent Hearing details: 2025 Melbourne (by telephone) 13 May Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR787266> [2025] FWC 1328 DECISION