Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Australian Workers' Union v Mainteck Services Pty Limited

[2025] FWC 599 Fair Work Commission 2025-01-01
Source
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Australian Workers' Union
Respondent: Mainteck Services Pty Limited

Ratio

The FWC granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 because all requirements of s.443(1) were met, including notification of a proposed enterprise agreement and genuine attempts by the union to reach agreement with the employer. The ballot period was set to close on 10 April 2025, and a compulsory conciliation conference was directed to follow.

Outcome

For applicant granted

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 6

  • Application made by Australian Workers' Union for protected action ballot order under s.437 FW Act
  • Employer Mainteck Services Pty Limited did not object to the application following discussions between parties
  • AWU provided undertaking to maintain emergency repair crew for slab caster to manage safety risks during industrial action
  • Separate application also made by Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) for same proposed enterprise agreement
  • Declaration from Shane Klein, Organiser, confirmed union had taken steps in bargaining and was genuinely trying to reach agreement
  • Matter determined on papers without hearing

Factors

For
  • Notification time in relation to proposed agreement established
  • All requirements of s.443(1) FW Act satisfied
  • Union demonstrated genuine attempts to reach agreement through bargaining
  • Employer did not object following discussions
  • Union provided safety undertaking regarding maintenance of emergency repair crews
Against

Legislation referenced

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A

Concept tags · 4

[P]Protected action ballot order [S]Enterprise agreement approval [S]Good faith bargaining [S]Conciliation and arbitration powers
Archived text (473 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Australian Workers' Union v Mainteck Services Pty Limited (B2025/297) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 27 FEBRUARY 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Mainteck Services Pty Limited [1] This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Mainteck Services Pty Limited (Mainteck or Employer). [2] I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)1 has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. [3] On 26 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties. [4] As sought by Mainteck, the AWU has provided the following undertaking to the Commission and the Employer: “In the event of industrial action, employees will maintain/provide a crew as necessary to provide urgent repair support to the Slab Caster in circumstances of a breakdown to ensure continuous casting and avoid the dumping of iron and associated safety issues.” [5] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [6] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Shane Klein, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Mainteck, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [7] The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). [2025] FWC 599 DECISION [2025] FWC 599 2 [8] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 April 2025.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [9] An Order has been separately issued in PR784820. [10] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR784821> 1 B2025/295. 2 This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.