Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)
Respondent: Ventia Australia Pty Ltd
Ratio
The Commission granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 because all requirements of s.443(1) were satisfied, including genuine bargaining by the applicant union, a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement, and the employer did not object to the amended application. Exceptional circumstances justified a minimum notice period of five working days rather than three.
Outcome
For applicant
granted
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 8
- Application by CEPU for protected action ballot order in relation to employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd
- Australian Workers' Union made a separate application for the same proposed enterprise agreement
- Employer did not object to the Application as amended on 17 February 2025
- Amendment concerned the extent of notice of industrial action to be provided
- Matter determined on papers without hearing
- Ian Gill, Organiser, declared that CEPU had genuinely tried to reach agreement with Ventia
- Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) approved as eligible protected action ballot agent to conduct ballot
- Voting to close on 6 March 2025 (11 working days from making the Order)
Factors
For
- All requirements in s.443(1) of the Fair Work Act were met
- Notification time in relation to proposed agreement was established
- Applicant union had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with employer
- Employer did not object to the amended application
- Eligible protected action ballot agent approved to conduct ballot
Against
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(5)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.414(2)(b)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A
Concept tags · 4
Principles · 1
articulates para 8
Exceptional circumstances may justify a minimum period of written notice exceeding the statutory default of three working days, as provided for in s.443(5) of the Fair Work Act.
Archived text (536 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (B2025/263) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 18 FEBRUARY 2025 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia or Employer). [2] I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU)1 has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. [3] On 17 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties. The amendment concerned the extent of notice of industrial action to be provided. [4] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [5] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ian Gill, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ventia, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [6] The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [7] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 March 2025.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [2025] FWC 489 DECISION [2025] FWC 489 2 [8] Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the minimum period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order. [9] An Order has been separately issued in PR784486. [10] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR784487> 1 B2025/262. 2 This is, in effect, 11 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific date sought in the application.