Health Services Union v Australian Capital Territory (ACT Health)
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Health Services Union
Respondent: Australian Capital Territory (ACT Health)
Ratio
The Commission granted a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 after determining that all s.443(1) requirements were met, the parties consented to an extended five working day notice period for certain safety-critical ballot questions on exceptional circumstances grounds (s.443(5)), and approving True Vote as the eligible ballot agent.
Outcome
For applicant
granted
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 11
- HSU sought a protected action ballot order for employees covered by the ACT Public Sector Health Professional Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026
- The application related to negotiations to replace the existing enterprise agreement
- The CPSU made a separate related application for the same proposed enterprise agreement
- On 13 April 2026, the parties reached a consent position on an extended minimum notice period of five working days for industrial action arising from specific ballot questions
- The employer (ACT Health) did not object to the application subject to amendments and consent position
- The employer noted that proposed industrial action may interact with professional duties and obligations under AHPRA and other professional standards agencies
- The employer raised concerns that certain questions posed significant risk to patient safety
- True Vote Pty Ltd was approved as the eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A
- Voting was to close on 8 May 2026
- The extended five working day notice period applied to industrial action arising from questions 16 and 17 concerning medical imaging professionals (Sonographers, Radiographers, Nuclear Medicine Technicians) and Cardiac Perfusionists
- The default three working day notice period applied to remaining forms of industrial action
Factors
For
- HSU had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with ACT Health as evidenced by Darren Brown's declaration setting out steps taken in bargaining
- There was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement
- All requirements in s.443(1) of the Act were met
- Relevant exceptional circumstances existed justifying extended notice period under s.443(5)
- True Vote was an approved eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A
Against
- Employer concerns regarding significant risk to patient safety from certain proposed industrial action questions
- Professional obligations under AHPRA and other professional standards agencies that might be affected by proposed industrial action
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(5)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.414(2)(b)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.468A
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A
Concept tags · 6
Principles · 6
articulates para 6
The requirement in s.443(1) to notify the Commission of a proposed agreement and all associated procedural requirements must be satisfied before a protected action ballot order can be granted.
articulates para 8
A written report requirement in an order clause is a standard and necessary feature of ballot administration, and adding clarifying language such as 'in writing' is unnecessary and potentially creates uncertainty about other requirements that must also be undertaken in writing.
articulates para 9
An extended minimum notice period for industrial action may be imposed under s.443(5) where relevant exceptional circumstances exist, particularly where proposed industrial action raises significant safety risks to patients or involves safety-critical roles.
cites para 6
The Commission has jurisdiction under s.437 to make a protected action ballot order where satisfied that the statutory requirements in s.443(1) are met, including that there is a notifiable agreement and genuine attempts to reach agreement have been made.
cites para 7
An eligible protected action ballot agent approved under s.468A is authorised to conduct a protected action ballot.
cites para 9
Where relevant exceptional circumstances exist under s.443(5), the Commission may extend the written notice period for industrial action beyond the default three working days.
Archived text (803 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Health Services Union v Australian Capital Territory (B2026/387) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 14 APRIL 2026 Proposed protected action ballot of employees covered by the ACT Public Sector Health Professional Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026 [1] This is an application by the Health Services Union (HSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT Health or Employer). [2] I note that the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU)1 has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. This application relates to negotiations to replace the ACT Public Sector Health Professional Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026. [3] On 13 April 2026, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the application if amended in certain respects. The parties reached a consent position on there being an extended minimum notice period for the taking of industrial action of five (5) working days for specific proposed ballot questions discussed below. In effect, the parties have accepted that there were relevant exceptional circumstances and also agreed to minor drafting amendments to the Applicant’s draft order relating to the conduct of the ballot and the proposed ballot questions. [4] I observe, for completeness, that the Respondent wished to note that engaging in the proposed industrial action may have interactions with the professional duties and obligations under the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or any other professional standards agencies. The Respondent further raised its concerns relating to specific questions which it asserts, would pose a significant risk to safety of patients, and wished to reserve its right to raise those concerns at a later date. [5] In the circumstances, I have amended the application to largely reflect the consent position and decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [6] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Darren Brown, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the HSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it [2026] FWC 1290 DECISION [2026] FWC 1290 2 has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with ACT Health, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [7] The ballot is to be conducted by True Vote Pty Ltd (True Vote). True Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. [8] With respect to the proposal to introduce the word “in writing” to order 14.2, I have not adopted what I consider to be an unnecessary and unhelpful amendment to the standard clause. The agent must by necessity always provide a written report and the use of that additional term in a single clause might create uncertainty about the many other requirements set out in the order, which must also be undertaken in writing. [9] I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when some employees take certain forms of industrial action set out in clause 5 of the Order made by the Commission. Pursuant to s.443(5), the period of written notice is extended to five (5) working days in respect of industrial action arising from questions 16 and 17 of clause 5 of the Order that is engaged or proposed to be engaged in by medical imaging health professionals (Sonographers, Radiographers, Nuclear Medicine Technicians) and/or Cardiac Perfusionists. The default period of three working days will apply to the remaining forms of action arising from the ballot question. [10] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 8 May 2026.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [11] An Order has been separately issued in PR798611. [12] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR798609> [2026] FWC 1290 3 1 B2026/378. 2 This is, in effect, 17 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.