Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union v Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd
Deputy President Hampton
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (known as Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union)
Respondent: Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd
Ratio
The Commission was satisfied that all requirements under s.443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met, including evidence of genuine bargaining and a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement, and accordingly granted the protected action ballot order sought by the AMWU.
Outcome
For applicant
granted
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 7
- Application made by AMWU for a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009
- Application relates to certain employees of Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd
- Employer did not object to the application but sought clarification on aspects of the bargaining process
- Matter determined on the papers without a hearing
- Declaration of Stephen Fodrocy, Industrial Officer, evidenced steps taken in bargaining and genuine attempts to reach agreement
- Ballot to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission
- Voting to close on 29 April 2026 (30 working days from the making of the Order)
Factors
For
- Declaration of Industrial Officer setting out genuine bargaining steps taken by AMWU
- Evidence that AMWU has been and is genuinely trying to reach agreement with Aspen
- Existence of a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement
- All requirements under s.443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 satisfied
Against
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.437
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(1)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.443(3)(c)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A(2)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.448A
Concept tags · 3
Principles · 1
articulates para 4
A protected action ballot order may be granted under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 where the applicant union has engaged in genuine bargaining with the employer and all requirements under s.443(1) are satisfied.
Archived text (402 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union v Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd (B2026/238) DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 16 MARCH 2026 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd – AEC ballot [1] This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Aspen Pharma Pty Ltd (Aspen or Employer). [2] On 16 March 2026, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application. However, Aspen sought to clarify aspects of the bargaining process stated in the AMWU application. [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Fodrocy, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Aspen, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. [5] The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 29 April 2026.1 This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. [7] An Order has been separately issued in PR797656. [2026] FWC 845 DECISION [2026] FWC 845 2 [8] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR797655> 1 This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and is the minimum period required by the AEC.