Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Alexander Teakle v Civil Independence Industries Pty Ltd

[2026] FWC 769 Fair Work Commission 2026-01-01
Source
Commissioner Simpson
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Alexander Teakle
Respondent: Civil Independence Industries Pty Ltd
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Sign in to analyse

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Concept tags · 4

[P]General protections (FW Act Pt 3-1) [P]Jurisdictional objection [S]Unfair dismissal (WA) [S]Unfair dismissal (federal)
Archived text (106 words)
1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.365—General protections Alexander Teakle v Civil Independence Industries Pty Ltd (C2025/13346) COMMISSIONER SIMPSON BRISBANE, 9 MARCH 2026 Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal - Jurisdictional objection - Applicant not employed by Respondent - Jurisdictional objection not contested - Application dismissed [1] I have determined that the application lodged by Mr Alexander Teakle (the Applicant) under s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) be dismissed, as the jurisdictional objection raised by Civil Independence Industries Pty Ltd, that it did not employ the Applicant, is not contested. COMMISSIONER Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR797458> [2026] FWC 769 DECISION