Benchmark WA Industrial Relations Case Database

Russel Molin v Alito Advisors Pty Ltd

[2024] WAIRC 770 Single Commissioner (WAIRC) 2024-08-15 File: B 39/2024
Source
Commissioner Emmanuel
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Russel Molin
Respondent: Alito Advisors Pty Ltd

Ratio

The applicant and respondent agreed to settle a claim for denied contractual benefits totalling $15,212.68 (net) by consent order, with the respondent to pay the amount in two instalments by agreed dates in exchange for discontinuance of the application.

Outcome

Resolved settled

Authority signal

Not yet cited by other cases Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority, green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data, amber = caution, red = treated negatively.

Key facts · 5

  • The respondent admitted owing the applicant $15,212.68 (net) in denied contractual benefits
  • A conference was held on 14 August 2024
  • The respondent offered settlement payments in two instalments: $5,050.54 (net) by 4 September 2024 and $10,162.14 (net) by 25 September 2024
  • The applicant accepted the respondent's settlement offer
  • The parties agreed to settle by consent order

Legislation referenced

  • Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) s29(1)(b)

Concept tags · 4

[P]Denied contractual benefits (WA s29(1)(b)) [P]Consent orders [S]Conciliation and arbitration powers [S]Compulsory conference
Archived text (260 words)
CONTRACTUAL BENEFIT CLAIM WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION PARTIES Russel Molin APPLICANT -v- Alito Advisors Pty Ltd RESPONDENT CORAM Commissioner T Emmanuel DATE THURsday, 15 August 2024 FILE NO/S B 39 OF 2024 CITATION NO. 2024 WAIRC 00770 Result Order issued Representation Applicant On his own behalf Respondent Mr D O’Haire as agent Order Whereas a conference was held in application B 39 of 2024 on 14 August 2024; AND Whereas the respondent admits that it owes the applicant a total of $15,212.68 (net) in respect of denied contractual benefits; AND Whereas to resolve application B 39 of 2024, the respondent offered to pay the applicant the following settlement sum: $5,050.54 (net) by electronic funds transfer by 4 September 2024; and $10,162.14 (net) by electronic funds transfer by 25 September 2024; in exchange for the applicant discontinuing his application within two business days of receiving the $15,212.68 (net) that the respondent owes the applicant; AND Whereas the applicant accepted the respondent’s offer; AND Whereas the parties asked the Commission to make consent orders reflecting their agreement to settle application B 39 of 2024; Now therefore, the Commission orders by consent that - 1. The respondent pay the applicant $5,050.54 (net) by electronic funds transfer by close of business on 4 September 2024. 2. The respondent pay the applicant $10,162.14 (net) by electronic funds transfer by close of business on 25 September 2024. 3. The applicant discontinue application B 39 of 2024 within two business days of receiving the $15,212.68 (net) owed to the applicant by the respondent. Commissioner T Emmanuel