Onoufriou v Salvation Army Salvos Stores
Cited 1×
Applicant: Onoufrios Onoufriou
Respondent: Salvation Army T/A Salvos Stores
Ratio
The FWC dismissed the unfair dismissal application under s.399A of the Fair Work Act 2009 because the applicant failed to comply with directions to file submissions, witness statements and documentary material by the prescribed deadline (10 November 2014) and subsequently failed to comply with a further direction to file materials in response to the respondent's s.399A dismissal application by 1 December 2014.
Outcome
Against applicant
dismissed
Authority signal
Cited 1×
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Key facts · 11
- Mr Onoufriou's employment was terminated on 4 September 2014
- Application for remedy from unfair dismissal filed on 19 September 2014
- Matter subject to conciliation but not resolved
- Directions issued and matter listed for hearing
- Mr Onoufriou directed to file outline of submissions, witness statements and documentary material by noon on 10 November 2014
- Mr Onoufriou failed to comply with the 10 November 2014 direction
- Respondent filed objection and sought dismissal on 10 November 2014
- Mr Onoufriou sent correspondence on 21 November 2014 regarding respondent's s.399A application
- Mr Onoufriou directed to file submissions and material by close of business on 1 December 2014 with warning that failure would result in dismissal
- Mr Onoufriou did not file any material with the Commission
- Application determined on the papers without hearing
Factors
For
Against
- Applicant failed to comply with direction to file outline of submissions, witness statements and documentary material by 10 November 2014
- Applicant failed to comply with direction to file submissions in response to s.399A application by 1 December 2014
- Applicant did not provide any material in opposition to the respondent's application to dismiss
Legislation referenced
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.394
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.399A
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.593
Concept tags · 4
Principles · 1
articulates para 7
The FWC may dismiss an application for an order under Division 4 if satisfied that the applicant has unreasonably failed to comply with a direction or order of the FWC relating to the application.
Archived text (486 words)
Onoufriou v Salvation Army Salvos Stores [2015] FWC 1348 (3 March 2015)
[2015] FWC 1348
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
DECISION
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394
—Unfair dismissal
Onoufrios Onoufriou
v
Salvation Army T/A Salvos Stores
(U2014/12719)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY
MELBOURNE, 2 MARCH 2015
Application for relief from unfair dismissal.
[1]
On19 September 2014, Mr Onoufrios Onoufriou made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under
s.394
of the
Fair Work Act 2009
. Mr Onoufriou’s employment had been terminated by Salvation Army T/A Salvos Stores on 4 September 2014.
[2]
The matter was the subject of conciliation however, the matter was not resolved. Consequently, directions were issued and the matter
was listed for hearing.
[3]
Mr Onoufriou was directed to file an outline of submissions, any witness statements and other documentary material he wished to rely
on by noon, on 10 November 2014.
[4]
On 10 November 2014, Salvos Stores filed an objection to the application and sought the dismissal of Mr Onoufriou’s application.
Salvos Stores based their objection Mr Onoufriou’s failure to comply with directions.
[5]
On 21 November 2014, Mr Onoufriou was sent correspondence informing him of Salvos Stores’ section 399A application. Mr Onoufriou
was directed to file submissions and other documentary material in respect of Salvos Stores’ application by close of business,
on 1 December 2014. Mr Onoufriou was advised that if he failed to comply with this direction, his application would be dismissed.
[6]
Mr Onoufriou did not file any material with the Commission.
[7]
Section 399A of the Act provides as follows:
399A Dismissing applications
(1) The FWC may, subject to subsection (2), dismiss an application for an order under Division 4 if the FWC is satisfied that the
applicant has unreasonably:
(a) failed to attend a conference conducted by the FWC, or a hearing held by the FWC, in relation to the application; or
(b) failed to comply with a direction or order of the FWC relating to the application; or
(c) failed to discontinue the application after a settlement agreement has been concluded.
....
(2) The FWC may exercise its power under subsection (1) on application by the employer.
(3) This section does not limit when the FWC may dismiss an application.
[8]
I am satisfied that Salvos Stores’ objection filed on 10 November 2014 is an application to have the matter dismissed for Mr
Onoufriou’s failure to comply with a direction.
[9]
Section 593
of the Act provides that the Commission is not required to hold a hearing except as provided by the Act.
[10]
As Mr Onoufriou did not file any material in opposition to the application to dismiss, I will determine the application on the papers.
[11]
After considering all the material, Mr Onoufriou’s application for remedy from unfair dismissal is dismissed. An order giving
effect to this decision will be issued today.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR561416>