Commissioner of Police (WA) v AM
Unknown
Not yet cited by other cases
Applicant: Commissioner of Police (WA)
Respondent: AM
This case hasn't been analysed yet.
Sign in to analyse
Generate ratio, outcome, key facts, concept tags and cited-case edges. Takes ~15–30 seconds.
Authority signal
Not yet cited by other cases
Signal-weighted score: 0.0
Derived from how later decisions have treated this case. Dark green = leading authority,
green = positively treated, grey = neutral or sparse data,
amber = caution, red = treated negatively.
Concept tags · 7
Archived text (166 words)
Court:
IACt(WA)
Judges:
Pullin, Buss and Le Miere JJ
Judgment Date:
22/11/2010
In this document:
Catchwords & Digest
Litigation History
Cases referring to this case
Cases considered by this case
Legislation considered by this case
Catchwords & Digest
·
Learn more
Practice and procedure — Costs — Unsuccessful appeal — Frivolous or vexatious
Application for costs orders.
Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission concluded respondent Police Commissioner's decision to remove applicant from office as police officer harsh, oppressive and unfair.
Supreme Court of Western Australia Court of Appeal dismissed respondent's appeal on grounds had no jurisdiction to hear grounds of appeal.
Applicant sought order that respondent pay costs of appeal under (WA) Industrial Relations Act 1979 s 86(2).
Proceedings must have been frivolously or vexatiously instituted to warrant costs order under s 86(2).
Lack of success or prospect of lack of success not sufficient to constitute frivolous or vexatious litigation.
Respondent's grounds of appeal not so obviously untenable that appeal had no prospects of success.
Application dismissed.